Author:
Kim Joo Heung,Park Sunggyun,Park Hyung Seok,Park Ji Soo,Lee Seung-Tae,Kim Sung-Won,Lee Jong Won,Lee Min Hyuk,Park Sue K.,Noh Woo-Chul,Choi Doo Ho,Han Wonshik,Jung Sung Hoo
Abstract
AbstractGenetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is crucial in diagnosing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes and has increased with the development of multigene panel tests. However, results classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) present challenges to clinicians in attempting to choose an appropriate management plans. We reviewed a total of 676 breast cancer patients included in the Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer (KOHBRA) study with a VUS on BRCA mutation tests between November 2007 and April 2013. These results were compared to the ClinVar database. We calculated the incidence and odds ratios for these variants using the Korean Reference Genome Database. A total of 58 and 91 distinct VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were identified in the KOHBRA study (comprising 278 and 453 patients, respectively). A total of 27 variants in the KOHBRA study were not registered in the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database. Among BRCA1 VUSs, 20 were reclassified as benign or likely benign, four were reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and eight remained as VUSs according to the ClinVar database. Of the BRCA2 VUSs, 25 were reclassified as benign or likely benign, two were reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and 33 remained as VUS according to the ClinVar database. There were 12 variants with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity for BRCA1 and 18 for BRCA2. Among them, p.Leu1780Pro showed a particularly high odds ratio. Six pathogenic variants and one conflicting variant identified using ClinVar could be reclassified as pathogenic variants in this study. Using updated ClinVar information and calculating odds ratios can be helpful when reclassifying VUSs in BRCA1/2.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Park, K. S., Cho, E. Y., Nam, S. J., Ki, C. S. & Kim, J. W. Comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with breast cancer: a multifactorial probability-based model versus ACMG standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants. Genet. Med. Off. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 18, 1250–1257 (2016).
2. Grindedal, E. M. et al. Current guidelines for BRCA testing of breast cancer patients are insufficient to detect all mutation carriers. BMC Cancer 17, 438 (2017).
3. Kotsopoulos, J. BRCA mutations and breast cancer prevention. Cancers 10, 524 (2018).
4. Practice Bulletin No 182: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Obstet. Gynecol. 130, e110–e126 (2017).
5. Krontiras, H., Farmer, M. & Whatley, J. Breast cancer genetics and indications for prophylactic mastectomy. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 98, 677–685 (2018).
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献