Abstract
AbstractOn conventional PET/CT, and under physiological conditions, the volume of the pituitary gland (PG) is small, and its metabolic activity is commonly comparable to the surrounding background level in 18F-FDG imaging. We compared the physiological 18F-FDG uptake of the PG in patients imaged with digital PET (dPET) and with conventional PET (cPET). Additionally, we performed phantom experiments to characterize signal recovery and detectability of small structures. We retrospectively included 10 dPET and 10 cPET patients and measured PG SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVratio (using cerebellum as reference). We imaged a modified NEMA/IEC phantom with both dPET and cPET (background activity 5 kBq/mL, and 3× and 5× higher concentrations in ∅2–20-mm spherical inserts). Mean recovery coefficients (RCmean) and signal-difference-to-noise-ratio (SDNR) were computed to assess lesion detectability. Patients imaged with dPET presented higher PG SUVmax and SUVratio (SUVR) compared to patients imaged with cPET (4.7 ± 2.05 vs. 2.9 ± 0.64, p = 0.004; and 0.62 ± 0.25 vs 0.39 ± 0.09, p = 0.029, respectively), while there was no difference for SUVmean (2.7 ± 1.32 vs 2.1 ± 0.44, p = 0.39). Thus, with a SUV readout scale of 0–5 g/mL, normal PG appeared abnormally hot with dPET, but not with cPET. Phantom evidenced higher RCmean in dPET compared to cPET. For both 3x and 5x measurements, lesion detectability according to size was systematically superior with dPET. In conclusion, patients imaged with dPET presented higher 18F-FDG physiological uptake of the PG as compared to patients imaged with cPET. These findings were supported by phantom experiments demonstrating superior signal recovery and small region detectability with dPET. Awareness of this new “higher” SUV of the normal 18F-FDG uptake of the PG is important to avoid potential pitfalls in image interpretation, notably in oncologic patients treated with immunotherapy, who are at increased risk to develop hypophysitis.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. Jeong, S. Y. et al. Incidental pituitary uptake on whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: a multicentre study. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 37, 2334–2343 (2010).
2. Hyun, S. H., Choi, J. Y., Lee, K.-H., Choe, Y. S. & Kim, B.-T. Incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary gland: clinical significance and differential diagnostic criteria. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 52, 547–550 (2011).
3. Komori, T., Martin, W. H., Graber, A. L. & Delbeke, D. Serendipitous detection of Cushing’s disease by FDG positron emission tomography and a review of the literature. Clin. Nucl. Med. 27, 176–178 (2002).
4. Campeau, R. J., David, O. & Dowling, A. M. Pituitary adenoma detected on FDG positron emission tomography in a patient with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Clin. Nucl. Med. 28, 296–298 (2003).
5. Koo, C. W. et al. Incidental detection of clinically occult pituitary adenoma on whole-body FDG PET imaging. Clin. Nucl. Med. 31, 42–43 (2006).
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献