Author:
Sadeghi Sina,Hempel Lars,Rodemund Niklas,Kirsten Toralf
Abstract
AbstractThe utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is on the rise, demanding increased accessibility to (public) medical data for benchmarking. The digitization of healthcare in recent years has facilitated medical data scientists’ access to extensive hospital data, fostering AI-based research. A notable addition to this trend is the Salzburg Intensive Care database (SICdb), made publicly available in early 2023. Covering over 27 thousand intensive care admissions at the University Hospital Salzburg from 2013 to 2021, this dataset presents a valuable resource for AI-driven investigations. This article explores the SICdb and conducts a comparative analysis with the widely recognized Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care - version IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The comparison focuses on key aspects, emphasizing the availability and granularity of data provided by the SICdb, particularly vital signs and laboratory measurements. The analysis demonstrates that the SICdb offers more detailed information with higher data availability and temporal resolution for signal data, especially for vital signs, compared to the MIMIC-IV. This is advantageous for longitudinal studies of patients’ health conditions in the intensive care unit. The SICdb provides a valuable resource for medical data scientists and researchers. The database offers comprehensive and diverse healthcare data in a European country, making it well suited for benchmarking and enhancing AI-based healthcare research. The importance of ongoing efforts to expand and make public datasets available for advancing AI applications in the healthcare domain is emphasized by the findings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Huston, P., Edge, V. & Bernier, E. Reaping the benefits of open data in public health. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 45, 252–256 (2019).
2. Seastedt, K. P. et al. Global healthcare fairness: We should be sharing more, not less, data. PLOS Digit. Health 1, e0000102 (2022).
3. Russell, S. The history and future of AI. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 37, 509–520 (2021).
4. Russell, S. & Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach 4th edn. (Pearson, London, 2020).
5. Chai, J., Zeng, H., Li, A. & Ngai, E. W. T. Deep learning in computer vision: A critical review of emerging techniques and application scenarios. Mach. Learn. Appl. 6, 100134 (2021).