Salzburg Intensive Care database (SICdb): a detailed exploration and comparative analysis with MIMIC-IV

Author:

Sadeghi Sina,Hempel Lars,Rodemund Niklas,Kirsten Toralf

Abstract

AbstractThe utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is on the rise, demanding increased accessibility to (public) medical data for benchmarking. The digitization of healthcare in recent years has facilitated medical data scientists’ access to extensive hospital data, fostering AI-based research. A notable addition to this trend is the Salzburg Intensive Care database (SICdb), made publicly available in early 2023. Covering over 27 thousand intensive care admissions at the University Hospital Salzburg from 2013 to 2021, this dataset presents a valuable resource for AI-driven investigations. This article explores the SICdb and conducts a comparative analysis with the widely recognized Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care - version IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The comparison focuses on key aspects, emphasizing the availability and granularity of data provided by the SICdb, particularly vital signs and laboratory measurements. The analysis demonstrates that the SICdb offers more detailed information with higher data availability and temporal resolution for signal data, especially for vital signs, compared to the MIMIC-IV. This is advantageous for longitudinal studies of patients’ health conditions in the intensive care unit. The SICdb provides a valuable resource for medical data scientists and researchers. The database offers comprehensive and diverse healthcare data in a European country, making it well suited for benchmarking and enhancing AI-based healthcare research. The importance of ongoing efforts to expand and make public datasets available for advancing AI applications in the healthcare domain is emphasized by the findings.

Funder

Universität Leipzig

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. Huston, P., Edge, V. & Bernier, E. Reaping the benefits of open data in public health. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 45, 252–256 (2019).

2. Seastedt, K. P. et al. Global healthcare fairness: We should be sharing more, not less, data. PLOS Digit. Health 1, e0000102 (2022).

3. Russell, S. The history and future of AI. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 37, 509–520 (2021).

4. Russell, S. & Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach 4th edn. (Pearson, London, 2020).

5. Chai, J., Zeng, H., Li, A. & Ngai, E. W. T. Deep learning in computer vision: A critical review of emerging techniques and application scenarios. Mach. Learn. Appl. 6, 100134 (2021).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3