Author:
Dadras Rezvan,Jabbari Alireza,Asl Narges Kamaei,Soltani Madjid,Rafiee Farnaz,Parsaee Mozhgan,Golchin Shadi,Pouraliakbar Hamidreza,Sadeghipour Parham,Alimohammadi Mona
Abstract
AbstractAccounting for 1.5% of thoracic trauma, blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) is a rare disease with a high mortality rate that nowadays is treated mostly via thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Personalised computational models based on fluid–solid interaction (FSI) principals not only support clinical researchers in studying virtual therapy response, but also are capable of predicting eventual outcomes. The present work studies the variation of key haemodynamic parameters in a clinical case of BTAI after successful TEVAR, using a two-way FSI model. The three-dimensional (3D) patient-specific geometries of the patient were coupled with three-element Windkessel model for both prior and post intervention cases, forcing a correct prediction of blood flow over each section. Results showed significant improvement in velocity and pressure distribution after stenting. High oscillatory, low magnitude shear (HOLMES) regions require careful examination in future follow-ups, since thrombus formation was confirmed in some previously clinically reported cases of BTAI treated with TEVAR. The strength of swirling flows along aorta was also damped after stent deployment. Highlighting the importance of haemodynamic parameters in case-specific therapies. In future studies, compromising motion of aortic wall due to excessive cost of FSI simulations can be considered and should be based on the objectives of studies to achieve a more clinical-friendly patient-specific CFD model
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Pehlivanlar Küçük, M. Predictors of mortality in cases with thoracic trauma admitted to the intensive care unit: 10-year clinical outcomes. Turk. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 1, 1 (2018).
2. Mouawad, N. J., Paulisin, J., Hofmeister, S. & Thomas, M. B. Blunt thoracic aortic injury—concepts and management. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 15, 1 (2020).
3. Gaffey, A. C. et al. Natural history of nonoperative management of grade II blunt thoracic aortic injury. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 65, 124–129 (2020).
4. Schulman, C. I. et al. Incidence and crash mechanisms of aortic injury during the past decade. J. Trauma Injury Infect. Crit. Care 62, 664–667 (2007).
5. Mosquera, V. X. et al. Role of conservative management in traumatic aortic injury: Comparison of long-term results of conservative, surgical, and endovascular treatment. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 142, 614–621 (2011).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献