Author:
Liao Zhenjie,Zhang Lijuan,Wang Xuanfei,Liang Shan
Abstract
AbstractThe tourism industry in China presents uneven tourism efficiency but deepening spatial associations; thus, tourism resources must be more rationally allocated. In this study, the highly efficient SBM model was used to measure the tourism environmental efficiency of 31 provinces in China. A spatial correlation network is then constructed based on the gravity model, and the structural characteristics and influencing factors of the network are analyzed. The results show that (1) the overall tourism environmental efficiency in China presents a fluctuating growth trend, with significantly higher values observed in the eastern region than in the central and western regions; moreover, the growth in efficiency in the eastern region has been relatively stable in recent years, that in the central region has increased, while that in the western region has significantly declined. (2) A spatially linked network with a stable tourism environmental efficiency structure has been formed in China. The number of network relations and density of the network fluctuate and increase, while the network efficiency continues to decrease; however, a strong small-world nature is observed. (3) An obvious network core–edge structure is observed, with Shanghai, Beijing, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu at the center showing a significant intermediary role and remote provinces such as Tibet, Xinjiang, Ningxia, and Inner Mongolia at the edge showing fewer connections. (4) The four major plates of China based on the CONCOR algorithm are sparsely connected internally and show strong inter-plate connections and spillover effects. (5) The industry support capacity difference matrix, technological development level difference matrix, transportation accessibility difference matrix, and environmental regulation level difference matrix significantly and positively affect spatial associations, while the geographical distance matrix significantly and negatively affect spatial association relationship establishment. These findings have important theoretical and practical significance for the sustainable development of tourism in China's provinces and cities.
Funder
a grant from the Guangzhou Huashang Colleg
the Philosophy and Social Sciences of Guangzhou in the 14th Five-year Perio
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Farrell, M. J. The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc. 120(3), 253–290 (1957).
2. Li, R. et al. Spatial characteristics of development efficiency for urban tourism in eastern China: A case study of six coastal urban agglomerations. J. Geogr. Sci. 24(6), 1175–1197 (2014).
3. Han, J. Carrying capacity of low carbon tourism environment in coastal areas from the perspective of ecological efficiency. J. Coast. Res. 83(5), 199–203 (2018).
4. Fang, S. M. & Huang, Y. Spatio-temporal evolutions and coordination of tourism efficiency and scale in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Acta Geogr. Sin. 75(8), 1757–1772 (2020).
5. Smiths, L. J. Regional analysis of tourism resources. Ann. Tour. Res. 14(2), 254–273 (1987).