Author:
Fajardo Sebastian,Kozowyk Paul R. B.,Langejans Geeske H. J.
Abstract
AbstractWe implement a method from computer sciences to address a challenge in Paleolithic archaeology: how to infer cognition differences from material culture. Archaeological material culture is linked to cognition, and more complex ancient technologies are assumed to have required complex cognition. We present an application of Petri net analysis to compare Neanderthal tar production technologies and tie the results to cognitive requirements. We applied three complexity metrics, each relying on their own unique definitions of complexity, to the modeled production processes. Based on the results, we propose that Neanderthal technical cognition may have been analogous to that of contemporary modern humans. This method also enables us to distinguish the high-order cognitive functions combining traits like planning, inhibitory control, and learning that were likely required by different ancient technological processes. The Petri net approach can contribute to our understanding of technology and cognitive evolution as it can be used on different materials and technologies, across time and species.
Funder
European Union’s Horizon 2020
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference91 articles.
1. Roebroeks, W. & Soressi, M. Neandertals revised. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 6372–6379 (2016).
2. Wynn, T. & Coolidge, F. L. The expert Neandertal mind. J. Hum. Evol. 46, 467–487 (2004).
3. Wadley, L. Compound-adhesive manufacture as a behavioral proxy for complex cognition in the Middle Stone Age. Curr. Anthropol. 51, 111–119 (2010).
4. Lombard, M., Högberg, A. & Haidle, M. N. Cognition: From capuchin rock pounding to Lomekwian flake production. Camb. Archaeol. J. 29, 201–231 (2019).
5. Nowell, A. & Davidson, I. Stone Tools and the Evolution of Human Cognition. (University Press of Colorado, 2010).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献