Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

AbstractTransnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) may be effective in delaying hypoxia, but the efficacy of THRIVE for oxygenation in elderly patients under general anaesthesia has not been assessed. This study assessed whether THRIVE prolonged the apnoea time in the elderly patients after induction. This was a single centre, two-group, randomized controlled trial. 60 patients (65 to 80 years of age) with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I ~ III who required tracheal intubation or the application of a laryngeal mask under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive oxygenation using THRIVE (100% oxygen, 30~70 litres min−1) or a facemask (100% oxygen, 10 litres min−1) during the pre-oxygenation period and during apnoea. The apnoea time, which was defined as the time from the cessation of spontaneous breathing until the SpO2 decreased to 90% or the apnoea time reached 10 minutes was recorded as the primary outcome. No significant differences were found on the baseline characteristics between the groups. The apnoea time was significantly increased (P < 0.01) in the THRIVE group. The median (interquartile range) apnoea times were 600 (600–600) s in the THRIVE group and 600 (231.5–600) s in the facemask group. No significant differences were found in the PaO2, PaCO2 and vital parameters between the THRIVE and facemask groups. No increased occurrence of complications, including haemodynamic instability, resistant arrhythmia or nasal discomfort, were reported in both the THRIVE group and the facemask group. THRIVE prolongs the apnoea time in elderly patients. THRIVE may be a more effective method for pre-oxygenation than a facemask in the elderly without pulmonary dysfunction.