Abstract
AbstractHumor research is supposed to predict whether something is funny. According to its theories and observations, amusement should be predictable based on a wide variety of variables. We test the practical value of humor appreciation research in terms of prediction accuracy. We find that machine learning methods (boosted decision trees) can indeed predict humor appreciation with an accuracy close to its theoretical ceiling. However, individual demographic and psychological variables, while replicating previous statistical findings, offer only negligible gains in accuracy. Successful predictions require previous ratings by the same rater, unless highly specific interactions between rater and joke content can be assessed. We discuss implications for humor research, and offer advice for practitioners designing content recommendations engines or entertainment platforms, as well as other research fields aiming to review their practical usefulness.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference75 articles.
1. Hofman, J. M. et al. Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science. Nature 595(7866), 181–188 (2021).
2. Hofmann, J., Platt, T., Ruch, W., Niewiadomski, R. & Urbain, J. The influence of a virtual companion on amusement when watching funny films. Motiv. Emot. 39(3), 434–447 (2015).
3. Ruch, W. Amusement. In The Oxford Companion to the Affective Sciences (eds Sander, D. & Scherer, K.) 27–28 (Oxford University Press, 2009).
4. Heintz, S. Separating content and structure in humor appreciation. J. Individ. Differ. 41(1), 37–44 (2020).
5. Ruch, W. & Rath, S. The nature of humor appreciation: Toward an integration of perception of stimulus properties and affective experience. Humor Int. J. Humor Res. 6(4), 363–384 (1993).