Differences in lung attenuation gradients between supine and standing positions in healthy participants on conventional/supine and upright computed tomography-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Differences in lung attenuation gradients between supine and standing positions in healthy participants on conventional/supine and upright computed tomography

Published:2024-09-14 Issue:1 Volume:14 Page:
ISSN:2045-2322
Container-title:Scientific Reports
language:en
Short-container-title:Sci Rep

Author:

Yagi Fumiko,Yamada Yoshitake,Yamada Minoru,Yokoyama Yoichi,Kozuka Atsunori,Hashimoto Masahiro,Otake Yoshito,Sato Yoshinobu,Chubachi Shotaro,Nozaki Taiki,Hatabu Hiroto,Fukunaga Koichi,Jinzaki Masahiro

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Takeda Science Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-72786-1.pdf

Reference39 articles.

1. Lee, K. N., Yoon, S. K., Sohn, C. H., Choi, P. J. & Webb, W. R. Dependent lung opacity at thin-section CT: evaluation by spirometrically-gated CT of the influence of lung volume. Korean J. Radiol.3, 24–29 (2002).

2. Verschakelen, J. A., Van fraeyenhoven, L., Laureys, G., Demedts, M. & Baert, A. L. Differences in CT density between dependent and nondependent portions of the lung: influence of lung volume. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.161, 713–717 (1993).

3. Gattinoni, L. et al. Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology. 74, 15–23 (1991).

4. Volpe, J., Storto, M. L., Lee, K. & Webb, W. R. High-resolution CT of the lung: determination of the usefulness of CT scans obtained with the patient prone based on plain radiographic findings. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.169, 369–374 (1997).

5. Swensen, S. J., Aughenbaugh, G. L. & Brown, L. R. High-resolution computed tomography of the lung. Mayo Clin. Proc.64, 1284–1294 (1989).