Author:
Hussein Abdinafic Mohamud,Ali Abdijalil Abdullahi,Ahmed Said Abdirahman,Mohamud Mohamed Farah Yusuf,Ahmed Mohammed A. M.,Kizilay Mehmet
Abstract
AbstractBlast and gunshot-induced penetrating traumatic vascular injuries represent a significant portion of patients with vascular trauma in countries where there are higher rates of war-related violence. These injuries are especially challenging in resource-limited countries due to early diagnosis and transfer delays. This report aimed to present our experience regarding the surgical management and outcome of such injuries at a major referral vascular surgery centre in the country. A retrospective descriptive review of 326 patients with blast and gunshot-induced penetrating traumatic vascular injuries managed during a five-year period between April 2018 and April 2023. The demographics, mechanism of injury, type of vascular injury, Anatomical location, time to the operation, length of hospital stay, amount of blood products given, concomitant neuroskeletal injuries, development of Vascular injury associated acute kidney injury, surgical procedures performed and patient outcome were reviewed. In this study, 326 patients with 445 vascular injuries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the patients were male 92.3%, and the mean age was 28.3 ± 9.9 years. The gunshot mechanism of vascular injury was implicated in 76.1% of the injuries, and explosive-induced injury was 78 (23.9%). 193 (59.2%) of the patients had isolated arterial injuries, 117 (35.9%) patients had combined arterial and venous injuries while 18 (4.9%) patients had isolated venous injuries. The most commonly injured arteries were the femoral artery, followed by Brachial and popliteal artery injuries (26.1%, 23.5% and 19.4%, respectively). The median time to revascularization was 8.8 ± 8.7 h. 46.8% of the patients had Concomitant fractures, while 26.5% had Concomitant nerve injuries. Only three patients had temporary non-heparin-bound shunts during their arrival. The most common surgical intervention in arterial injuries was reversed saphenous vein graft 46.1%. The mortality was 5.8% and 7.7% of the patients needed secondary amputation. The majority of wartime arterial injuries are a result of Blast and gunshot vascular injuries. Frequent need for autologous vein grafts should be considered to manage such injuries. Results are encouraging despite delays in intervention; therefore, all viable limbs should be revascularized, keeping in mind the long-term functionality of the limb.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. He, J. C., Clancy, K., Schechtman, D., Conrad-Schnetz, K. J. & Claridge, J. A. Traumatic vascular injuries: Who are repairing them and what are the outcomes? Am. J. Surg. 211(3), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.11.011 (2016).
2. Tahtabasi, M., Er, S. & Karasu, R. Bomb blast: Imaging findings, treatment and clinical course of extremity traumas. BMC Emerg. Med. 7, 1–10 (2021).
3. Bade, Z. A. Understanding Somali conflict: Causes, consequences and strategies for peace-building. Dev. Country Stud. 11(3), 46–57 (2021).
4. Plurad, D. S. Blast injury. Mil. Med. 176(3), 276–282 (2011).
5. Stefanopoulos, P. K., Hadjigeorgiou, G. F., Filippakis, K. & Gyftokostas, D. Gunshot wounds: A review of ballistics related to penetrating trauma. J. Acute Dis. 3(3), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-6189(14)60041-X (2014).