Author:
Misumi Kayo,Hagiwara Yoshihiro,Kimura Takuya,Hifumi Toru,Inoue Akihiko,Sakamoto Tetsuya,Kuroda Yasuhiro,Ogura Takayuki, ,Sawano Hirotaka,Egawa Yuko,Kato Shunichi,Sugiyama Kazuhiro,Bunya Naofumi,Kasai Takehiko,Ijuin Shinichi,Nakayama Shinichi,Kanda Jun,Kanou Seiya,Takiguchi Toru,Yokobori Shoji,Takada Hiroaki,Inoue Kazushige,Takeuchi Ichiro,Honzawa Hiroshi,Kobayashi Makoto,Hamagami Tomohiro,Takayama Wataru,Otomo Yasuhiro,Maekawa Kunihiko,Shimizu Takafumi,Nara Satoshi,Nasu Michitaka,Takahashi Kuniko,Fukuda Reo,Shiraishi Shinichiro,Zushi Ryosuke,Otani Norio,Kikuchi Migaku,Watanabe Kazuhiro,Nakagami Takuo,Shoko Tomohisa,Kitamura Nobuya,Otani Takayuki,Matsuoka Yoshinori,Sakuraya Masaaki,Arimoto Hideki,Homma Koichiro,Naito Hiromichi,Nakao Shunichiro,Okazaki Tomoya,Tahara Yoshio,Okamoto Hiroshi,Kunikata Jun,Yokoi Hideto
Abstract
AbstractRecently, patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) refractory to conventional resuscitation have started undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). However, the mortality rate of these patients remains high. This study aimed to clarify whether a center ECPR volume was associated with the survival rates of adult patients with OHCA resuscitated using ECPR. This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective multicenter registry study, the SAVE-J II study, involving 36 participating institutions in Japan. Centers were divided into three groups according to the tertiles of the annual average number of patients undergoing ECPR: high-volume (≥ 21 sessions per year), medium-volume (11–20 sessions per year), or low-volume (< 11 sessions per year). The primary outcome was survival rate at the time of discharge. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared among the three groups. Moreover, a multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model was applied to study the impact of center ECPR volume. A total of 1740 patients were included in this study. The center ECPR volume was strongly associated with survival rate at the time of discharge; furthermore, survival rate was best in high-volume compared with medium- and low-volume centers (33.4%, 24.1%, and 26.8%, respectively; P = 0.001). After adjusting for patient characteristics, undergoing ECPR at high-volume centers was associated with an increased likelihood of survival compared to middle- (adjusted odds ratio 0.657; P = 0.003) and low-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio 0.983; P = 0.006). The annual number of ECPR sessions was associated with favorable survival rates and lower complication rates of the ECPR procedure.Clinical trial registration: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041577 (unique identifier: UMIN000036490).
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC