Author:
Salvi Carola,Beeman Mark,Bikson Marom,McKinley Richard,Grafman Jordan
Abstract
AbstractProblem-solving is essential for advances in cultural, social, and scientific knowledge. It is also one of the most challenging cognitive processes to facilitate. Some problem-solving is deliberate, but frequently people solve problems with a sudden insight, also known as a Eureka or “Aha!” moment. The advantage of solving problems via insight is that these solutions are more accurate, relying on a unique pattern of neural activity, compared to deliberative strategies. The right Anterior Temporal Lobe (rATL), putatively involved in semantic integration, is distinctively activated when people experience an insight. The rATL may contribute to the recognition of distant semantic relations that support insight solutions, although fMRI and EEG evidence for its involvement is, by nature, correlational. In this study, we investigate if focal sub-threshold neuromodulation to the rATL facilitates insight problem-solving. In three different groups, using a within- and between-subjects design, we tested the causal role of this brain region in problem-solving, by applying High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the rATL (active and sham condition) or the left frontopolar region while participants attempted to solve Compound Remote Associates problems before, during and after stimulation. Participants solved a higher percentage of problems, overall, and specifically by insight when they received rATL stimulation, compared to pre-stimulation, and compared to sham and left frontopolar stimulation. These results confirm the crucial role played by the rATL in insight problem-solving.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference79 articles.
1. Smith, S. M. Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. in The Nature of Insight (eds. Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E.) 229–251 (MIT Press, 1995).
2. Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E., Schooler, J. W., Fallshore, M. & Fiore, S. M. The Nature of Insight. Epilogue: Putting Insight into Perspective. (1996).
3. Kaplan, C. A. & Simon, H. A. In search of insight. Cogn. Psychol. 22, 374–419 (1990).
4. Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E. & Beeman, M. Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Think. Reason. 22, 443–460 (2016).
5. Danek, A. H. & Wiley, J. What about false insights? Deconstructing the Aha! experience along its multiple dimensions for correct and incorrect solutions separately. Front. Psychol. 7, 2077 (2017).
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献