Author:
Dembski Sofia,Schwarz Thomas,Oppmann Maximilian,Bandesha Shahbaz Tareq,Schmid Jörn,Wenderoth Sarah,Mandel Karl,Hansmann Jan
Abstract
AbstractRobotic systems facilitate relatively simple human–robot interaction for non-robot experts, providing the flexibility to implement different processes. In this context, shorter process times, as well as an increased product and process quality could be achieved. Robots short time-consuming processes, take over ergonomically unfavorable tasks and work efficiently all the time. In addition, flexible production is possible while maintaining or even increasing safety. This study describes the successful development of a dual-arm robot-based modular infrastructure and the establishment of an automated process for the reproducible production of nanoparticles. As proof of concept, a manual synthesis protocol for silica nanoparticle preparation with a diameter of about 200 nm as building blocks for photonic crystals was translated into a fully automated process. All devices and components of the automated system were optimized and adapted according to the synthesis requirements. To demonstrate the benefit of the automated nanoparticle production, manual (synthesis done by lab technicians) and automated syntheses were benchmarked. To this end, different processing parameters (time of synthesis procedure, accuracy of dosage etc.) and the properties of the produced nanoparticles were compared. We demonstrate that the use of the robot not only increased the synthesis accuracy and reproducibility but reduced the personnel time and costs up to 75%.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Fraunhofer-Institut für Silicatforschung ISC
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. O. Ehrentraut, Prognos AG, Arbeitslanschaft 2040. https://www.prognos.com/sites/default/files/2021-01/20150521_prognos_arbeitslandschaft2040-final.pdf (2015).
2. Frohm, J., Lindström, V., Stahre, J. & Wintoth, M. Levels of automation in manufacturing. Int. J. Ergon. Hum. Factors 30, 28 (2008).
3. Loy, D. M., Krzysztoń, R., Lächelt, U., Rädler, J. O. & Wagner, E. Controlling nanoparticle formulation: A low-budget prototype for the automation of a microfluidic platform. Processes 9, 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010129 (2021).
4. Egorov, E., Pieters, C., Korach-Rechtman, H., Shklover, J. & Schroeder, A. Robotics, microfluidics, nanotechnology and AI in the synthesis and evaluation of liposomes and polymeric drug delivery systems. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 11, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-021-00929-2 (2021).
5. Farrant, E. Automation of synthesis in medicinal chemistry: Progress and challenges. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 11, 1506–1513. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00292 (2020).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献