Author:
Youn Young-Ah,Kim Sae Yun,Cho Su Jin,Chang Yun Sil,Miyake Fuyu,Kusuda Satoshi,Iskandar Adhi Teguh Perma,Rohsiswatmo Rinawati,Dewi Rizalya,Chee Seok Chiong,Neoh Siew Hong,Imperial Ma. Lourdes S.,Velasco Belen Amparo E.,Quek Bin Huey,Lin Yuh-Jyh,Chang Jui-Hsing,Nuntnarumit Pracha,Ngerncham Sopapan,Supapannachart Sarayut,Ozawa Yuri,Tomotaki Seiichi,Prempunpong Chatchay,Prempraphan Pathaporn,Isayama Tetsuya
Abstract
AbstractAdvances in perinatal care have led to the increased survival of preterm infants with subsequent neonatal morbidities, such as retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). This study aims to compare the differences of neonatal healthcare systems, resources, and clinical practice concerning ROP in Asia with review of current literature. An on-line survey at the institutional level was sent to the directors of 336 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in 8 collaborating national neonatal networks through the Asian Neonatal Network Collaboration (AsianNeo). ROP screening was performed in infants born at < 34 weeks in Indonesia and Japan. In South Korea, Malaysia, and Taiwan, most screened for ROP in infants born at < 32 weeks. In all networks, majority of NICUs conducted ROP screening to infants with birth weight < 1500 g. In most NICU’s in-hospital ophthalmologists performed indirect ophthalmoscopy and some were supplemented with digital imaging. Both laser photocoagulation and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection are performed for treatment and, vitreous surgeries are conducted less frequently in all countries. Despite limited information collected by the survey, this first study to compare ROP practices implemented in eight Asian countries through AsianNeo will enable an understanding of the differences and facilitate quality improvement by sharing better practices.
Funder
Korea National Institute of Health
National Center for Child Health and Development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC