Author:
Alvarado Rachel,van den Hoogen Lotus L.,Iriemenam Nnaemeka C.,Akinmulero Oluwaseun O.,Thomas Andrew N.,Tamunonengiyeofori Israel,Erasogie Evbuomwan,Chimaoge Achugbu C.,Dawurung Ayuba B.,Esiekpe Mudiaga K.,Okoli Mary U.,Mba Nwando,Ogunniyi Abiodun,Abimiku Alash’le,Maire Mark,Bassey Orji O.,Okoye McPaul,Swaminathan Mahesh,Greby Stacie M.,Ndodo Nnaemeka,Ihekweazu Chikwe,Abubakar Ado,Steinhardt Laura,Rogier Eric
Abstract
AbstractMultiplex assays for malaria antigen detection can gather data from large sample sets, but considerations for the consistency and quality assurance (QA) of mass testing lack evaluation. We present a QA framework for a study occurring November 2019 to March 2020 involving 504 assay plates detecting four Plasmodium antigens: pan-Plasmodium aldolase and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2), P. vivax LDH (PvLDH). Controls on each plate included buffer blank, antigen negative blood, and 4-point positive dilution curve. The blank and negative blood provided consistently low signal for all targets except for pAldolase, which showed variability. Positive curve signals decreased throughout the 5-month study duration but retained a coefficient of variation (CV) of < 5%, with the exception of HRP2 in month 5 (CV of 11%). Regression fittings for inter-plate control signals provided mean and standard deviations (SDs), and of 504 assay plates, 6 (1.2%) violated the acceptable deviation limits and were repeated. For the 40,272 human blood samples assayed in this study, of 161,088 potential data points (each sample × 4 antigens), 160,641 (99.7%) successfully passed quality checks. The QA framework presented here can be utilized to ensure quality of laboratory antigen detection for large sample sets.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献