A new intervention to prevent social isolation in people with complex communication needs

Author:

Canossa Dias João,Mineiro Ana,Damen Saskia

Abstract

AbstractWhile implementing communication interventions, practitioners follow diverse theoretical models. Different conceptual orientations influence the way professionals embrace the subject of communication and its disorders. This research project explores the co-creation and validation of a new model and intervention program to analyze and improve communication between persons with Complex Communication Needs and their caregivers. The methodology incorporated a comprehensive narrative review, as foundation for the new model and intervention proposal. Succeeding this stage, the team implemented an online Delphi Panel to improve and validate these results, involving 17 international renowned experts. Following the Appropriateness Method, 25 indications were subject to scrutiny and rated as appropriate with minimal values of disagreement among the evaluators. Qualitative feedback was used to improve the research products. Quality assurance measures were taken to ensure quality and transparency of the results. A new conceptual framework of atypical interpersonal communication and intervention program result from the investigation. The new model is inspired by the Transactional model and principles of Dialogism. The intervention consists of consultations with caregivers, using video analysis and a dialogical methodology to enhance communication. The next research phase is to pilot-test the intervention program with clinicians supporting persons with disability at risk of social isolation.

Funder

FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference57 articles.

1. Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A. & Oetzel, J. G. Foundations of communication theory. In Theories of Human Communication (eds Littlejohn, S. W. et al.) 3–18 (Waveland Press, 2021).

2. Andersen, P. A. When one cannot not communicate: A challenge to motley’s traditional communication postulates. Commun. Stud. 42, 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979109368346 (2009).

3. Ruler, B. V. Communication theory: An underrated pillar on which strategic communication rests. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 12, 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452240 (2018).

4. Adler, R. B. & Proctor, R. F. II. A first look at interpersonal communication. In Looking Out Looking in (eds Adler, R. B. & Proctor, R. F., II.) 2–37 (Wadsworth, 2011).

5. West, R. & Turner, L. H. Thinking about communication: definitions, models, and ethics. In Introducing Communication Theory. Analysis and Application (eds West, R. & Turner, L. H.) 3–25 (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3