Author:
Grydaki N.,Colbeck I.,Whitby C.
Abstract
AbstractDespite the significant amount of time spent in the domestic environment, culture-independent size distribution data of bioaerosols are largely missing. This study investigated the temporal changes in size-resolved bacterial aerosols in urban and semi-urban residential settings. Overall, airborne bacterial taxa identified in both sites were dispersed across particles of various sizes. qPCR analysis showed that outdoors bacteria dominated particles > 8 μm, whilst indoor bacterial loadings were greater with 1–2 μm (winter) and 2–4 μm (summer) ranges. Indoor and outdoor aerosols harboured distinct bacterial communities due to the dominance of human-associated taxa (Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, Corynebacterium) in indoor air. The aerosol microbiome exhibited significant temporal variation, with Actinobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli predominant indoors, whereas Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were the most abundant taxa outdoors. The variation between the two residences was mostly driven by particles < 2 μm, whereas differences between indoors and outdoors were mostly influenced by particles > 2 μm. Source-tracking analysis estimated that household surfaces accounted for the greatest source proportion of bacteria, surpassing that of outdoor air, which varied due to natural ventilation throughout the year. Our findings provide new insights into the factors governing the aerosol microbiome in residential environments which are crucial for exposure assessment.
Funder
FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions
Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Colbeck, I. & Whitby, C. Biological Particles in the Indoor Environment. In Indoor Air Pollution (eds Harrison, R. M. & Hester, R. E.) (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019).
2. Dimitroulopoulou, C., Ashmore, M. R. & Terry, A. C. Use of population exposure frequency distributions to simulate effects of policy interventions on NO2 exposure. Atmos. Environ. 150, 1–14 (2017).
3. Sadigh, A., Fataei, E., Arzanloo, M. & Imani, A. A. Bacteria bioaerosol in the indoor air of educational microenvironments: Measuring exposures and assessing health effects. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 19, 1635–1642 (2021).
4. Pertegal, V., Lacasa, E., Cañizares, P., Rodrigo, M. A. & Sáez, C. Understanding the influence of the bioaerosol source on the distribution of airborne bacteria in hospital indoor air. Environ. Res. 216, 114458 (2023).
5. Grydaki, N., Colbeck, I., Mendes, L., Eleftheriadis, K. & Whitby, C. Bioaerosols in the Athens Metro: Metagenetic insights into the PM10 microbiome in a naturally ventilated subway station. Environ. Int. 146, 106186 (2021).