Older adults use a motor plan that is detrimental to endpoint control

Abstract

AbstractHere, we aimed to understand if older adults (OA) use a unique motor plan that is detrimental to endpoint control. We performed two experiments that used ankle ballistic contractions that reversed at the target. In Experiment 1, eight young adults (YA; 27.1 ± 4.2) and eight OA (73.3 ± 4.5) aimed to perform an ankle dorsiflexion–plantarflexion movement that reversed at 9° in 180 ms (target). We found that the coordination pattern (motor plan) differed for the two groups. OA used significantly greater soleus (SOL) activity to reverse the ankle movement than YA and exhibited greater tibialis anterior (TA) muscle activity variability (p < 0.05). OA exhibited worse endpoint control than YA, which associated with the exacerbated TA variability (R2 > 0.2; p < 0.01). Experiment 2 aimed to confirm that the OA motor plan was detrimental to endpoint control. Fifteen YA (20.5 ± 1.4) performed an ankle dorsiflexion–plantarflexion contraction that reversed at 30% MVC in 160 ms by using either a pattern that mimicked OA (High SOL) or YA (Low SOL). With the High SOL coordination pattern, YA exhibited impaired endpoint control and greater TA activation variability. These findings provide strong evidence that OA select a unique motor plan that is detrimental to endpoint control.