Author:
Zannoni Ronja,Keil Julian,Ponseti Jorge,Stirn Aglaja V.,Holtfrerich Sarah K. C.,Diekhof Esther K.
Abstract
AbstractPrevious fMRI research found increased brain responses in men with pedophilic interest to non-sexual pictures of child and animal faces. This raised the question of whether an aberrant nurturing system could be linked to pedophilia. To further explore this hypothesis, 20 pedohebephilic and 23 teleiophilic men performed a target detection task with adult versus infant human and animal faces, which measured selective attention towards the baby schema by comparing reaction times to infant versus adult targets that were presented amongst distractors of the other category. Since the response to baby schema can be influenced by steroid hormones, saliva samples were additionally collected to determine endogenous testosterone, progesterone, estradiol and cortisol. Contrary to expectations, all men did not react faster to infant than adult faces. Yet, pedohebephilic men were more distracted by infant’s faces than teleiophilic men. Pedohebephilic men with higher testosterone were faster in orienting attention to infant targets in the context of adult distractors. This association was not observed in teleiophilic men. Our results support the idea of an overactive nurturing system in pedophilia, which may be influenced by the endogenous testosterone level.
Funder
UKSH Foundation
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference77 articles.
1. Beier, K. M., Bosinski, H. A. G. & Loewit, K. Sexualmedizin: Grundlagen und Praxis; mit 61 Tabellen und 50 Übersichten. (Urban & Fischer, 2005).
2. Dombert, B. et al. How common is men’s self-reported sexual interest in prepubescent children?. J. Sex Res. 53, 214–223 (2016).
3. Mohnke, S. et al. Brain alterations in paedophilia: A critical review. Prog. Neurobiol. 122, 1–23 (2014).
4. Tenbergen, G. et al. The neurobiology and psychology of pedophilia: Recent advances and challenges. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 344 (2015).
5. Ponseti, J. et al. Human face processing is tuned to sexual age preferences. Biol. Lett. 10, 20140200 (2014).