Author:
Park Jihee,Ko Eun Young,Han Boo-Kyung,Ko Eun Sook,Choi Ji Soo,Kim Haejung
Abstract
AbstractIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the benefits and losses of mammography with and without implant displacement (ID) and propose an appropriate imaging protocol for the screening of breasts with implants. We evaluated mammograms of 162 breasts in 96 patients including 71 breasts with biopsy-proven cancers. Mammography of each breast included standard MLO and ID MLO images. We reviewed the mammograms using clinical image quality criteria, which consist of parameters that evaluate the proper positioning of the breast and the image resolution. Standard MLO images showed significantly higher scores for proper positioning but showed significantly lower scores for image resolution than the ID MLO images. Moreover, standard MLO images showed significantly higher kVp, mAs, and compressed breast thickness than the ID MLO images. The organ dose was also higher in the standard MLO images than in the ID MLO images, but the difference was not statistically significant. In mammography with proven cancer, ID MLO images showed significantly higher degree of cancer visibility than standard MLO images. For screening mammography in patients with breast implants, ID MLO view alone is sufficient for MLO projection with reducing the patient’s radiation dose without compromising the breast cancer detection capability, especially in dense breasts with subpectoral implants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference18 articles.
1. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: An independent review. Lancet 380, 1778–1786. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0 (2012).
2. Perry, N. et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition–summary document. Ann. Oncol. 19, 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm481 (2008).
3. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Cancer-Preventive Interventions. Breast Cancer Screening. 2. Screening Techniques. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (FR). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546557/ (2016). Accessed 3 Mar 2022.
4. Sá Dos Reis, C., Gremion, I. & Richli Meystre, N. Study of breast implants mammography examinations for identification of suitable image quality criteria. Insights Imaging 11, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0816-5 (2020).
5. Smathers, R. L. et al. Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 1414–1421. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0998 (2007).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献