Author:
Marschalko Marian,Popielarczyk Dariusz,Vicherek Petr,Niemiec Dominik,Kubac Jan
Abstract
AbstractThe aim of the paper is to carry out a comparative engineering-geological study of four different waste landfills using the evaluation criteria for the geological subsoil as a natural sealing barrier. The study evaluates 4 localities (Velké Pavlovice, Kvítkovice, Prakšice and Horní Suchá) using three variants (based on two standards) which approach the geological barrier requirements as a combination of impermeability requirements based on a filtration coefficient limit value. and the required geometry represented by investigation depths. The research was carried out in landfills in Moravia, in the east of the Czech Republic. The study’s motivation is to point at the differences in engineering-geological investigations of waste landfills (as for the requirements for impermeable geological subsoil as a natural sealing barrier) when compared with other engineering structures (where the main goal is to evaluate load-bearing capacity and settlement). The purpose of the geological barrier is to prevent the spread of contamination, and the paper shows this can be approached differently, as shown in two different methodologies investigated herein. The first model (Model 1) assumes there is a 3-m-thick subsoil below the landfill’s footing bottom, which manifests impermeability characterized by the filtration coefficient Kf ≤ 1.0 * 10–9 m/s, or a 30-m-thick subsoil of Kf ≤ 1.0 * 10–8 m/s. The second model (Model 2) assumes a 1-m thick, impermeable subsoil massif of Kf ≤ 1.0 * 10–9 m/s. We found that none of the landfills in the four selected localities had an impermeable layer in the required depth (a filtration coefficient Kf from 1.8 * 10–9 to 3.9 * 10–9 m/s), and thus did not comply with the limiting conditions. As a result, an anthropogenic technical barrier had to be installed. An important goal of the study from an environmental point of view was to assess the existence of a suitable geological barrier under the proposed landfills. The most important criterion from this point of view is permeability. An additional technical objective of the project was also the assessment of the possible creation of a technical anthropogenic isolation barrier. In the event that the natural sealing barrier would not be sufficient. This was shown in all solved case studies of engineering geological investigations of waste landfills.
Funder
Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference54 articles.
1. Ersoy, H., Bulut, F. & Berkün, M. Landfill site requirements on the rock environment: A case study. Eng. Geol. 154, 20–35 (2013).
2. Huang, Y. & Fan, G. Engineering geological analysis of municipal solid waste landfill stability. Nat. Hazards 84(1), 93–107 (2016).
3. Israde-Alcantara, I., Delgado, O. B. & Chavez, A. C. Geological characterization and environmental implications of the placement of the Morelia dump, Michoacán, central Mexico. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 55(6), 755–764 (2005).
4. Xiang, R. et al. Isolation distance between municipal solid waste landfills and drinking water wells for bacteria attenuation and safe drinking. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–11 (2019).
5. Bouazza, A. & Kavazanjian Jr, E. Construction on former landfills. In Proceedings 2nd ANZ Conference on Environmental Geotechnics, Newcastle (pp. 467–482) (2004).