Author:
Anobile Giovanni,Marazzi Moreno,Federici Stefano,Napoletti Agnese,Cecconi Lucia,Arrighi Roberto
Abstract
AbstractWhen asked to estimate the number of items in the visual field, neurotypical adults are more precise and rapid if the items are clustered into subgroups compared to when they are randomly distributed. It has been suggested that this phenomenon, termed “groupitizing”, relies on the recruitment of arithmetical calculation strategies and subitizing. Here the role of arithmetical skills in groupitizing was investigated by measuring the groupitizing effect (or advantage) in a sample of children and adolescents with and without math learning disability (dyscalculia). The results showed that when items were grouped, both groups of participants showed a similar advantage on sensory precision and response time in numerosity estimates. Correlational analyses confirmed a lack of covariation between groupitizing advantage and math scores. Bayesian statistics on sensory precision sustained the frequentist analyses providing decisive evidence in favor of no groups difference on groupitizing advantage magnitude (LBF = − 0.44) and no correlation with math scores (LBF = − 0.57). The results on response times, although less decisive, were again in favor of the null hypothesis. Overall, the results suggest that the link between groupitizing and mathematical abilities cannot be taken for granted, calling for further investigations on the factors underlying this perceptual phenomenon.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Butterworth, B., Varma, S. & Laurillard, D. Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science 332, 1049–1053 (2011).
2. Agrillo, C. & Bisazza, A. Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals. J. Neurosci. Methods 234, 82–91 (2014).
3. Butterworth, B., Gallistel, C. R. & Vallortigara, G. Introduction: The origins of numerical abilities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 373, 1740 (2017).
4. Dehaene, S. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics (Oxford University Press, 2011).
5. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S. & Spelke, E. Core systems of number. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 307–314 (2004).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献