Author:
Nicolaï Cyril,Chaumon Maximilien,van Wassenhove Virginie
Abstract
AbstractPsychological time is influenced by multiple factors such as arousal, emotion, attention and memory. While laboratory observations are well documented, it remains unclear whether cognitive effects on time perception replicate in real-life settings. This study exploits a set of data collected online during the Covid-19 pandemic, where participants completed a verbal working memory (WM) task in which their cognitive load was manipulated using a parametric n-back (1-back, 3-back). At the end of every WM trial, participants estimated the duration of that trial and rated the speed at which they perceived time was passing. In this within-participant design, we initially tested whether the amount of information stored in WM affected time perception in opposite directions depending on whether duration was estimated prospectively (i.e., when participants attend to time) or retrospectively (i.e., when participants do not attend to time). Second, we tested the same working hypothesis for the felt passage of time, which may capture a distinct phenomenology. Third, we examined the link between duration and speed of time, and found that short durations tended to be perceived as fast. Last, we contrasted two groups of individuals tested in and out of lockdown to evaluate the impact of social isolation. We show that duration and speed estimations were differentially affected by social isolation. We discuss and conclude on the influence of cognitive load on various experiences of time.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Holman, E. A. & Grisham, E. L. When time falls apart: The public health implications of distorted time perception in the age of COVID-19. Psychol. Trauma Theory Res. Pract. Policy 12, S63 (2020).
2. Chaumon, M. et al. The Blursday database as a resource to study subjective temporalities during COVID-19 Nat. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2(1), 13 (2022).
3. Hicks, R. E. Prospective and retrospective judgments of time: A neurobehavioral analysis. in Time, action and cognition 97–108 (Springer, 1992).
4. Hicks, R. E., Miller, G. W. & Kinsbourne, M. Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed. Am. J. Psychol. 12, 719–730 (1976).
5. Balci, F., Meck, W. H., Moore, H. & Brunner, D. Timing deficits in aging and neuropathology. in Animal Models of Human Cognitive Aging 1–41 (Springer, 2009).