Author:
Tung Yu-Hung,Li Wei‑Ming,Juan Yung-Shun,Huang Tsung-Yi,Wang Yen-Chun,Yeh Hsin-Chih,Lee Hsiang-Ying
Abstract
AbstractTo enhance the accuracy of predicting stone-free rates after retrograde intrarenal surgery, we devised a novel approach to assess the renal infundibulopelvic angle. We conducted a retrospective review of patient records for those who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones between April 2018 and August 2019. Patient demographics, stone characteristics, and perioperative data were recorded. Subsequently, we introduced a modified angle measurement called the pelvic stone angle and evaluated its predictive performance for stone-free rates by comparing it with the traditional method in scoring systems. A total of 43 individuals were included in this study. Notable differences in stone burden and Hounsfield unit measurements were found between stone-free and non-stone-free patients. The pelvic stone angle demonstrated a good model fit when used in scoring systems, performing equally well as the conventional approach. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the R.I.R.S. scoring system using the pelvic stone angle and the conventional approach did not show a significant difference. In conclusion, the predictive ability of the pelvic stone angle for stone-free rates was comparable to the old measurement method. Moreover, scoring systems using the pelvic stone angle exhibited a better model fit than those using the conventional approach.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Sorokin, I. et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J. Urol. 35, 1301–1320 (2017).
2. Assimos, D. et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, part II. J. Urol. 196, 1161 (2016).
3. Demirbas, A. et al. Comparision of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of multicalyceal and multiple renal stones. Urol. J. 15, 318–322 (2018).
4. Fayad, M. K., Fahmy, O., Abulazayem, K. M. & Salama, N. M. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal pelvic stone more than 2 centimeters: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis 50, 113–117 (2022).
5. Giulioni, C. et al. The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: Results from 2946 patients. World J. Urol. 41, 1407–1413 (2023).