Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to curate clustered findings of duplex ultrasound in the evaluation of spermatic venous varicoceles, and deliver more responses to the present concerns. Archives of 979 men who had undergone scrotum and spermatic venous plexus duplex ultrasound were reviewed. In the duplex ultrasound interrogation, the sizes of the larger vessels of the spermatic venous plexus, peritesticular vessels, and testicular volume and relevant parameters were measured. Findings of the vessels were analyzed. One hundred and eight-one out of 979 patients had varicoceles. Color Doppler flow signal was rendered in veins of pampiniform plexus but not in peritesticular vessels in 501 out of 979 patients; 101 out of 501 patients had veins of pampiniform plexus ≤ 3 mm, no color Doppler flow signal could be rendered in the veins in the 101 patients at supine and standing positions without Valsalva maneuver, color Doppler flow signal could be rendered in the veins in 82 out of 101 patients at supine and standing positions with Valsalva maneuver; no color Doppler flow signal could be rendered in the veins from 19 out of 101 patients with and without Valsalva maneuver at supine and standing positions. 37 out of 979 patients with 61 ipsilateral testicular volume ≤ 5 mL had no vessel diameter > 2 mm. The incidences of varicoceles corresponding to different ranges of testicular volume of 1–5 mL, 5.1–10 mL, 10.1–15 mL, 15.1–20 mL, 20.1–25 mL, and 25.1–30 mL were 0.0%, 6.9%, 8.3%, 6.63%, 20.94%, and 59.1%, respectively. The comparisons of incidences of varicocele between distribution percentages of different ranges of testicular volume of 1–5 mL and others (of 5.1 mL and more) were all significant (all P < 0.05). The correlation coefficient between the different ranges of testicular volume and the incidence of varicoceles was 0.829. Increased testicular volume may be also a factor for the development of varicoceles. Dilated peritesticular vessels may be collateral veins of spermatic veins, anterior and posterior scrotal veins, or proximal vas deferens.
Funder
Th is work was supported by the Medical Scientific Research Funds of Hainan Provincial Health Commission
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference19 articles.
1. Jungwirth, A., Diemer, T., Kopa, Z., Krausz, C., Minhas, S. & Tournaye, H. Guidelines on male infertility. European Association of Urology. (EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, 2019). https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-Male-Infertility-2018-large-text.pdf.
2. Alsaikhan, B., Alrabeeah, K., Delouya, G. & Zini, A. Epidemiology of varicocele. Asian J. Androl. 18, 179–181 (2016).
3. Dubin, L. & Amelar, R. D. Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil. Steril. 22, 469–474 (1971).
4. Freeman, S. et al. Ultrasound evaluation of varicoceles: guidelines and recommendations of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESUR-SPIWG) for detection, classification, and grading. Eur. Radiol. 30, 11–25 (2020).
5. Patil, V., Shetty, S. M. & Das, S. K. Redefining the criteria for grading varicoceles based on reflux times: A clinicoradiological correlation. Ultrasound Q. 32, 82–85 (2016).