Author:
Lin Hui-Yi,Mazumder Harun,Sarkar Indrani,Huang Po-Yu,Eeles Rosalind A.,Kote-Jarai Zsofia,Muir Kenneth R., ,Schleutker Johanna,Pashayan Nora,Batra Jyotsna, ,Neal David E.,Nielsen Sune F.,Nordestgaard Børge G.,Grönberg Henrik,Wiklund Fredrik,MacInnis Robert J.,Haiman Christopher A.,Travis Ruth C.,Stanford Janet L.,Kibel Adam S.,Cybulski Cezary,Khaw Kay-Tee,Maier Christiane,Thibodeau Stephen N.,Teixeira Manuel R.,Cannon-Albright Lisa,Brenner Hermann,Kaneva Radka,Pandha Hardev, ,Park Jong Y.
Abstract
AbstractSingle nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) interactions are the key to improving polygenic risk scores. Previous studies reported several significant SNP–SNP interaction pairs that shared a common SNP to form a cluster, but some identified pairs might be false positives. This study aims to identify factors associated with the cluster effect of false positivity and develop strategies to enhance the accuracy of SNP–SNP interactions. The results showed the cluster effect is a major cause of false-positive findings of SNP–SNP interactions. This cluster effect is due to high correlations between a causal pair and null pairs in a cluster. The clusters with a hub SNP with a significant main effect and a large minor allele frequency (MAF) tended to have a higher false-positive rate. In addition, peripheral null SNPs in a cluster with a small MAF tended to enhance false positivity. We also demonstrated that using the modified significance criterion based on the 3 p-value rules and the bootstrap approach (3pRule + bootstrap) can reduce false positivity and maintain high true positivity. In addition, our results also showed that a pair without a significant main effect tends to have weak or no interaction. This study identified the cluster effect and suggested using the 3pRule + bootstrap approach to enhance SNP–SNP interaction detection accuracy.
Funder
U.S. Department of Defense
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC