Author:
Liao Hongxia,Chen Liqiang,Liu Meiling,Chen Junfeng
Abstract
AbstractProper sealing of laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) is critical for airway management in clinical use. Understanding the sealing mechanism can significantly help front-line anaesthetists to reduce the incidence of adverse events. However, anaesthetists, who may not have the most substantial engineering backgrounds, lack intuitive ways to develop an understanding of the LMA sealing mechanism effectively. The paper aims to study the LMA-pharynx sealing mechanisms from the perspective of front-line anaesthetists. We use a computer-aided 3D modelling technique to visualise the LMA—pharynx interactions, which helps anaesthetists identify the critical areas of complications. Furthermore, we conduct a quantitative pressure distribution analysis of the LMA-pharynx contacting surface using the finite element analysis technique, which helps further understand the sealing mechanics in those areas. We present two cases studies based on one male volunteer, aged 50, inserted with a ProSeal LMA. In the first case, a relatively low cuff pressure (CP) was applied to simulate the clinical circumstances in which complications related to air leakage are most likely to happen; in the second case, we increase the CP to a relatively high value to simulate the scenarios with an increased risk of complications related to high mucosal pressure. The experiments suggest the follows: (1) Sore throat complications related to high mucosal pressure is most likely to occur in the hypopharynx with a high CP setting, particularly in the areas where the cricoid cartilage presses the mucosa. (2) The narrow hyoid bone super horn width likely causes LMA insertion difficulties. (3) Insufficient CP will significantly increase the risk of air leakage in the oropharynx. A complete sealing pressure line in the contacting surface will be formed with sufficient CP, thereby preventing the air leakage into the oral.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Morse, Z., Sano, K., Kageyama, I. & Kanri, T. The relationship of placement accuracy and insertion times for the laryngeal mask airway to the training of inexperienced dental students. Anesth. Prog. 49, 9 (2002).
2. Wilson, I., Fell, D., Robinson, S. & Smith, G. Cardiovascular responses to insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 47, 300–302 (1992).
3. Brimacombe, J. The advantages of the lma over the tracheal tube or facemask: A meta-analysis. Can. J. Anaesth. 42, 1017–1023 (1995).
4. Zhu, Y. et al. Cricoid-mental distance-based versus weight-based criteria for size selection of classic laryngeal mask airway in adults: A randomized controlled stud. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 33, 759–765 (2019).
5. Berry, A., Brimacombe, J., McManus, K. & Goldblatt, M. An evaluation of the factors influencing selection of the optimal size of laryngeal mask airway in normal adults. Anaesthesia 53, 565–570 (1998).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献