Author:
Grisetto Fanny,Delevoye-Turrell Yvonne N.,Roger Clémence
Abstract
AbstractFlexible use of reactive and proactive control according to environmental demands is the key to adaptive behavior. In this study, forty-eight adults performed ten blocks of an AX-CPT task to reveal the strength of proactive control by the calculation of the proactive behavioral index (PBI). They also filled out the UPPS questionnaire to assess their impulsiveness. The median-split method based on the global UPPS score distribution was used to categorize participants as having high (HI) or low (LI) impulsiveness traits. The analyses revealed that the PBI was negatively correlated with the UPPS scores, suggesting that the higher is the impulsiveness, the weaker the dominance of proactive control processes. We showed, at an individual level, that the PBI increased across blocks and suggested that this effect was due to a smaller decrease in reactive control processes. Notably, the PBI increase was slower in the HI group than in the LI group. Moreover, participants who did not adapt to task demands were all characterized as high impulsive. Overall, the current study demonstrates that (1) impulsiveness is associated with less dominant proactive control due to (2) slower adaptation to task demands (3) driven by a stronger reliance on reactive processes. These findings are discussed in regards to pathological populations.
Funder
Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Région Hauts-de-France
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Ridderinkhof, K. R., Forstmann, B., Wylie, S., Burle, B. & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: Resisting the call of the Sirens. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2, 174–192 (2011).
2. Nigg, J. T. Annual Research Review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 58, 361–383 (2017).
3. Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R. & Burgess, G. C. Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In Variation in Working Memory (eds Conway, A. et al.) (Oxford University Press, 2007).
4. Braver, T. S. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 106–113 (2012).
5. Braver, T. S., Paxton, J. L., Locke, H. S. & Barch, D. M. Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex. PNAS 106, 7351–7356 (2009).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献