Author:
Mackenzie Henry R.,Latham M. Cecilia,Anderson Dean P.,Hartley Stephen,Norbury Grant L.,Latham A. David M.
Abstract
AbstractEffective mitigation of the impacts of invasive ship rats (Rattus rattus) requires a good understanding of their ecology, but this knowledge is very sparse for urban and peri-urban areas. We radiomarked ship rats in Wellington, New Zealand, to estimate detection parameters (σ, ε0, θ, and g0) that describe the process of an animal encountering a device (bait stations, chew cards and WaxTags) from a distance, and then approaching it and deciding whether to interact with it. We used this information in simulation models to estimate optimal device spacing for eradicating ship rats from Wellington, and for confirming eradication. Mean σ was 25.37 m (SD = 11.63), which equates to a circular home range of 1.21 ha. The mean nightly probability of an individual encountering a device at its home range center (ε0) was 0.38 (SD = 0.11), whereas the probability of interacting with the encountered device (θ) was 0.34 (SD = 0.12). The derived mean nightly probability of an individual interacting with a device at its home range center (g0) was 0.13 (SD = 0.08). Importantly, σ and g0 are intrinsically linked through a negative relationship, thus g0 should be derived from σ using a predictive model including individual variability. Simulations using this approach showed that bait stations deployed for about 500 days using a 25 m × 25 m grid consistently achieved eradication, and that a surveillance network of 3.25 chew cards ha−1 or 3.75 WaxTags ha−1 active for 14 nights would be required to confidently declare eradication. This density could be halved if the surveillance network was deployed for 28 nights or if the prior confidence in eradication was high (0.85). These recommendations take no account of differences in detection parameters between habitats. Therefore, if surveillance suggests that individuals are not encountering devices in certain habitats, device density should be adaptively revised. This approach applies to initiatives globally that aim to optimise eradication with limited funding.
Funder
Predator Free Wellington
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference89 articles.
1. Long, J. L. Introduced Mammals of the World: Their History, Distribution and Influence (CSIRO Publishing, 2003).
2. Tate, G. H. H. Rodents of the genera Rattus and Mus from the Pacific Islands, collected by the Whitney South Sea expedition: With a discussion of the origin and races of the Pacific Island rat. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 68, 145–178 (1935).
3. Atkinson, I. A. E. The spread of commensal species of Rattus to oceanic islands and their effect on island avifaunas. Conserv. Island Birds 3, 35–81 (1985).
4. Clout, M. N. & Russell, J. C. The invasion ecology of mammals: A global perspective. Wildl. Res. 35, 180–184 (2007).
5. Feng, A. Y. T. & Himsworth, C. G. The secret life of the city rat: A review of the ecology of urban Norway and black rats (R. norvegicus and Rattus rattus). Urban Ecosyst. 17, 149–162 (2014).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献