Perceptual (but not acoustic) features predict singing voice preferences

Author:

Bruder CamilaORCID,Poeppel David,Larrouy-Maestri Pauline

Abstract

AbstractWhy do we prefer some singers to others? We investigated how much singing voice preferences can be traced back to objective features of the stimuli. To do so, we asked participants to rate short excerpts of singing performances in terms of how much they liked them as well as in terms of 10 perceptual attributes (e.g.: pitch accuracy, tempo, breathiness). We modeled liking ratings based on these perceptual ratings, as well as based on acoustic features and low-level features derived from Music Information Retrieval (MIR). Mean liking ratings for each stimulus were highly correlated between Experiments 1 (online, US-based participants) and 2 (in the lab, German participants), suggesting a role for attributes of the stimuli in grounding average preferences. We show that acoustic and MIR features barely explain any variance in liking ratings; in contrast, perceptual features of the voices achieved around 43% of prediction. Inter-rater agreement in liking and perceptual ratings was low, indicating substantial (and unsurprising) individual differences in participants’ preferences and perception of the stimuli. Our results indicate that singing voice preferences are not grounded in acoustic attributes of the voices per se, but in how these features are perceptually interpreted by listeners.

Funder

Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference84 articles.

1. Savage, P. E., Brown, S., Sakai, E. & Currie, T. E. Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 8987–8992 (2015).

2. Mehr, S. A. et al. Universality and diversity in human song. Science 366, eaax0868 (2019).

3. Demetriou, A., Jansson, A., Kumar, A. & Bittner, R. M. Vocals in music matter: the relevance of vocals in the minds of listeners. In Proceedings of the 19th ISMIR Conference (Paris, France, 2018).

4. Fechner, G.T. Vorschule Der Aesthetik [Elements of Aesthetics]. (Breitkopf & Härtel, Weimar, Leipzig: Universitätsbibliothek, 1876).

5. McManus, I. C., Cook, R. & Hunt, A. Beyond the Golden Section and normative aesthetics: Why do individuals differ so much in their aesthetic preferences for rectangles?. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 4, 113–126 (2010).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3