Author:
Wada Fiseha Wadilo,Mekonnen Michael Fekadu,Sawiso Edlawit Desta,Kolato Sitotaw,Woldegiorgis Lideta,Kera Gemechu Kebede,El-Khatib Ziad,Ashuro Akililu Alemu,Biru Mulatu,Boltena Minyahil Tadesse
Abstract
AbstractThe number of diabetic foot ulcer patients is substantially increasing, with the rapidly rising burden of diabetic mellitus in sub-Saharan Africa. The data on the regional prevalence of diabetic foot ulcer infecting bacteria and their antimicrobial resistance patterns is crucial for its proper management. This systematic review and meta-analysis determined the pooled prevalence of bacterial profiles and antimicrobial resistance patterns of infected diabetic foot ulcers in sub-Saharan Africa. A comprehensive search of the literature was performed on CINAHL, EMBASE, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Critical appraisal was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute’s tool for prevalence studies. A pooled statistical meta-analysis was conducted using STATA Version 17.0. The I2 statistics and Egger’s test were used to assess the heterogeneity and publication bias. The pooled prevalence and the corresponding 95% confidence interval of bacterial profiles and their antimicrobial resistance patterns were estimated using a random effect model. Eleven studies with a total of 1174 study participants and 1701 bacteria isolates were included. The pooled prevalence of the most common bacterial isolates obtained from DFU were S. aureus (34.34%), E. coli (21.16%), and P. aeruginosa (20.98%). The highest pooled resistance pattern of S. aureus was towards Gentamicin (57.96%) and Ciprofloxacin (52.45%). E.coli and K. Pneumoniae showed more than a 50% resistance rate for the most common antibiotics tested. Both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were associated with diabetic foot ulcers in sub-Saharan Africa. Our findings are important for planning treatment with the appropriate antibiotics in the region. The high antimicrobial resistance prevalence rate indicates the need for context-specific effective strategies aimed at infection prevention and evidence-based alternative therapies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Armstrong, D. G., Boulton, A. J. & Bus, S. A. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2367–2375 (2017).
2. Atlas, D. International diabetes federation. In IDF Diabetes Atlas, 7th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation 33, 2 (2015).
3. Zhang, P. et al. Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Med. 49, 106–116 (2017).
4. Ugwu, E. et al. Burden of diabetic foot ulcer in Nigeria: Current evidence from the multicenter evaluation of diabetic foot ulcer in Nigeria. World J. Diabetes 10, 200 (2019).
5. Abbas, Z. G. The Diabetic Foot Worldwide: sub‐Saharan Africa. The foot in diabetes, 51–60 (2020).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献