Author:
Ambrosino Annalisa,Pironti Concetta,Dell’Annunziata Federica,Giugliano Rosa,Chianese Annalisa,Moccia Giuseppina,DeCaro Francesco,Galdiero Massimiliano,Franci Gianluigi,Motta Oriana
Abstract
AbstractThis study investigated the performance of 24 commercial disinfectants present on the market during last year according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Recently, national and international organizations of public health performed studies on disinfection products due to the increasing awareness of the potential and growing risks on human health, such as skin damage and reactions in the mucosal lining, especially for the healthcare workers in their frequent daily use. However, there are many limitations in the common cleaning/disinfection products on market as in the selection of effective disinfectants to decontaminate inanimate surfaces. We analyzed the disinfection power of hydrogen peroxide, quaternary ammonium compounds, alcohols, phenols and aldehydes used as active principles according to international guidelines. The antimicrobial properties were assessed by broth microdilution, and antibiofilm properties against Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus); their virucidal efficacy was tested against Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The quaternary ammonium compounds demonstrated better efficacy than others and in some cases ready to use products had also virucidal and antimicrobial activities after dilution at 0.125%. The scientific evidence indicates that many commercial products are used at high concentrations and high doses and this could have deleterious effects both on human health and the environment. A lower concentration of active ingredients would avoid the excessive release of chemicals into the environment and improve skin tolerance, ensuring the health and safety protection of workers, including the healthcare operators at their workplace.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Slotosch, C. M., Kampf, G. & Löffler, H. Effects of disinfectants and detergents on skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 57, 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01200.x- (2007).
2. Tasar, R., Wiegand, C. & Elsner, P. How irritant are n-propanol and isopropanol?—A systematic review. Contact Dermatitis 84, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13722-(2021) (2021).
3. Bahareh, A.-N. Frequent handwashing amidst the COVID-19 outbreak: Prevention of hand irritant contact dermatitis and other considerations. Health Sci. Rep. 3, 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.163 (2020).
4. Pedersen, L. K., Held, E., Johansen, J. D. & Agner, T. Short-term effects of alcohol-based disinfectant and detergent on skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 52, 82–87 (2005).
5. Donald, S. & Appa, Y. Glycerine: A natural ingredient for moisturizing skin. In Dry Skin and Moisturizers, Chemistry and Function, Dermatology: Clinical and Basic Sciences Series (ed. LodenM, M. H.) 213–228 (CRC Press, 2000).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献