Author:
Busch Susan,Ghoncheh Mohammad,Lenarz Thomas,Maier Hannes
Abstract
AbstractDirect acoustic cochlear stimulation uses piston motion to substitute for stapes footplate (SFP) motion. The ratio of piston to stapes footplate motion amplitude, to generate the same loudness percept, is an indicator of stimulation efficiency. We determined the relationship between piston displacement to perceived loudness, the achieved maximum power output and investigated stapes fixation and obliteration as confounding factors. The electro-mechanical transfer function of the actuator was determined preoperatively on the bench and intraoperatively by laser Doppler vibrometry. Clinically, perceived loudness as a function of actuator input voltage was calculated from bone conduction thresholds and direct thresholds via the implant. The displacement of a 0.4 mm diameter piston required for a perception equivalent to 94 dB SPL at the tympanic membrane compared to normal SFP piston displacement was 27.6–35.9 dB larger, consistent with the hypothesis that the ratio between areas is responsible for stimulation efficiency. Actuator output was 110 ± 10 eq dB SPLFF @1Vrms ≤ 3 kHz and decreased to 100 eq dB SPLFF at 10 kHz. Output was significantly higher for mobile SFPs but independent from obliteration. Our findings from clinical data strongly support the assumption of a geometrical dependency on piston diameter at the biological interface to the cochlea.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference19 articles.
1. ASTM International. in ASTM F2504-05 ASTM International 1–6 (2005).
2. Grossöhmichen, M. et al. Validation of methods for prediction of clinical output levels of active middle ear implants from measurements in human cadaveric ears. Sci. Rep. 7, 15877. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16107-9 (2017).
3. Zwartenkot, J. W., Snik, A. F. M., Kompis, M. & Stieger, C. Gain and maximum output of implantable hearing devices in patients with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. JHS 2, 35–40 (2012).
4. Zwartenkot, J. W., Snik, A. F. M., Mylanus, E. A. M. & Mulder, J. J. S. Amplification options for patients with mixed hearing loss. Otol. Neurotol. 35, 221–226 (2014).
5. Chatzimichalis, M., Sim, J. H. & Huber, A. M. Assessment of a direct acoustic cochlear stimulator. Audiol. Neurootol. 17, 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339214 (2012).