Author:
Cunha Silva Laura,Friker Brian,Warembourg Charlotte,Kanankege Kaushi,Wera Ewaldus,Berger-González Monica,Alvarez Danilo,Dürr Salome
Abstract
AbstractDomestic dogs can affect human health through bites and pathogen transmission, particularly in resource-poor countries where dogs, including owned ones, predominantly roam freely. Habitat and resource selection analysis methods are commonplace in wildlife studies but have not been used to investigate the environmental resource use of free-roaming domestic dogs (FRDD). The present study implements GPS devices to investigate habitat selection by FRDD from an urban site and a rural site in Indonesia, and one urban and two rural sites in Guatemala (N = 321 dogs). Spatial mixed effects logistic regression models, accounting for heterogeneous distribution of the resources, showed that patterns of habitat selection by FRDD were similar across study sites. The most preferred resources were anthropogenic, being buildings and roads, which implies selection for human proximity. Vegetation and open fields were less preferred and steep terrain was avoided, indicating that FRDD were synanthropic and that their space patterns likely optimised energy use. Results presented here provide novel data on FRDD habitat selection patterns, while improving our understanding of dog roaming behaviour. These findings provide insights into possible high-risk locations for pathogen transmission for diseases such as rabies, and can assist management authorities in the planning and deployment of efficient disease control campaigns, including oral vaccination.
Funder
Albert-Heim-Stiftung
Wolfermann-Nägeli Foundation
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. WOAH. OIE ad hoc Group for the Revision of Chapter 7.7, Stray dog population control. http//www.oie.int/en/international-standard-setting/specialists-commissions-groups/code-commission-reports/meetings-reports/ (2019).
2. Arluke, A. & Atema, K. Roaming dogs, in The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies 1–25 (Oxford University Press, 2017).
3. Rubin, H. D. & Beck, A. M. Ecological behavior of free-ranging urban pet dogs. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8, 161–168 (1982).
4. Daniels, T. J. & Bekoff, M. Population and social biology of free-ranging dogs, Canis familiaris. J. Mammal. 70, 754–762 (1989).
5. Slater, M. R. The role of veterinary epidemiology in the study of free-roaming dogs and cats. Prev. Vet. Med. 48, 273–286 (2001).
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献