Author:
Nørskov Natalja P.,Battelli Marco,Curtasu Mihai V.,Olijhoek Dana W.,Chassé Élisabeth,Nielsen Mette Olaf
Abstract
AbstractPlant secondary metabolites (PSMs) can potentially reduce ruminal methane formation. However, related to differences in their molecular structures, it is not yet clear what causes an anti-methanogenic effect. In an in vitro system simulating rumen fermentation, we investigated the impact of eight compounds with distinct chemical characteristics (gallic and salicylic acids, tannic acid, catechin, epicatechin, quercetin, rutin, and salicin) when added to a basal feed (maize silage) at a concentration of 12% of the feed dry matter. After 48 h of incubation in buffered rumen fluid, methane production was significantly lowered by quercetin (43%), tannic acid (39%) and salicylic acid (34%) compared to the control (maize silage alone) and without changes in total volatile fatty acid production during fermentation. No other PSM reduced methane formation as compared to control but induced significant differences on total volatile fatty acid production. The observed differences were related to lipophilicity, the presence of double bond and carbonyl group, sugar moieties, and polymerization of the compounds. Our results indicate the importance of distinct molecular structures of PSMs and chemical characteristics for methane lowering properties and volatile fatty acid formation. Further systematic screening studies to establish the structure–function relationship between PSMs and methane reduction are warranted.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014).
2. Niu, M. et al. Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3368–3389 (2018).
3. Patra, A. K. & Saxena, J. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 91, 24–37 (2011).
4. Knapp, J. R., Laur, G. L., Vadas, P. A., Weiss, W. P. & Tricarico, J. M. Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. J. Dairy Sci. 97, 3231–3261 (2014).
5. Palangi, V., Taghizadeh, A., Abachi, S. & Lackner, M. Strategies to mitigate enteric methane emissions in ruminants: A review. Sustainability 14, 13229 (2022).