Author:
Kim Soo Min,Kim Seong-tak,Han Dong-woon,Kim Dae-Geun
Abstract
AbstractThe clavicle has various anatomic shapes unique to each individual. Additionally, with the increase in high-energy traumas such as sports injuries and traffic accidents, the patterns of fractures become complex and complicated. Thus, there is a need for a variety of shapes of locking compression plates (LCP) to accommodate different types of fractures and facilitate quicker rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to present different types of LCP that secure fracture fragments and distribute stress evenly, in comparison to typical anatomical LCPs, for reinforcing clavicle fractures. Three models were compared in this study: the typical shape, the center hole removed shape, and the double-curved wing shape. The DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) file obtained from the computed tomography scan of the patient’s clavicle was used to extract the three-dimensional (3D) clavicle structure. Finite element analysis (FEA) simulation was employed to analyze the structural changes of the LCP under external forces. A reinforced jig was used to apply the same type of external force to each LCP, and an experiment was conducted to analyze the mechanical impact of the LCP’s structural characteristics. When comparing the stress values at the fracture zone point, resulting from the FEA simulation with applied bending forces, it was calculated that the stress dispersion effect was approximately ten times greater when transitioning from a typical LCP shape to a double-curved partial wing structure. Moreover, the ultimate stress increased 3.33 times, from 241.322 to 804.057 N, as the LCP design changed under cantilever bending conditions. This double-curved wing LCP design reduces stress concentration at the fracture site and minimizes stress in the fracture area when subjected to cantilever bending forces. Consequently, this newly designed LCP has the potential to decrease complications related to the plate and accelerate rehabilitation protocols.
Funder
The Soonchunhyang University Research Fund
Ppuri Technology based Advancement Support Program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Nordqvist, A. & Petersson, C. The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1976–2007) 300, 127–132 (1994).
2. Robinson, C. M. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult: Epidemiology and classification. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 80, 476–484 (1998).
3. Postacchini, F., Gumina, S., De Santis, P. & Albo, F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 11, 452–456 (2002).
4. Rowe, C. R. 4 an atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1976–2007) 58, 29–42 (1968).
5. Lazarides, S. & Zafiropoulos, G. Conservative treatment of fractures at the middle third of the clavicle: The relevance of shortening and clinical outcome. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 15, 191–194 (2006).