Author:
Cheng Qiuping,Wen Xue,Ye Guozhen,Liu Yanchi,Kong Yilong,Mo Lei
Abstract
AbstractMorality judgment usually refers to the evaluation of moral behavior`s ability to affect others` interests and welfare, while moral aesthetic judgment often implies the appraisal of moral behavior's capability to provide aesthetic pleasure. Both are based on the behavioral understanding. To our knowledge, no study has directly compared the brain activity of these two types of judgments. The present study recorded and analyzed brain activity involved in the morality and moral aesthetic judgments to reveal whether these two types of judgments differ in their neural underpinnings. Results reveled that morality judgment activated the frontal, parietal and occipital cortex previously reported for motor representations of behavior. Evaluation of goodness and badness showed similar patterns of activation in these brain regions. In contrast, moral aesthetic judgment elicited specific activations in the frontal, parietal and temporal cortex proved to be involved in the behavioral intentions and emotions. Evaluation of beauty and ugliness showed similar patterns of activation in these brain regions. Our findings indicate that morality judgment and moral aesthetic judgment recruit different cortical networks that might decode others' behaviors at different levels. These results contribute to further understanding of the essence of the relationship between morality judgment and aesthetic judgment.
Funder
the National Natural Science Foundation
the Project of Key Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences
the National Social Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference125 articles.
1. Trevino, L. K., Sutton, C. D. & Woodman, R. W. Effects of reinforcement contingencies and cognitive moral development on ethical decision-making behavior: An Experiment. in (1985).
2. Diessner, R., Rust, T., Solom, R. C., Frost, N. & Parsons, L. Beauty and hope: a moral beauty intervention. J. Moral Educ. 35, 301–317 (2006).
3. Diessner, R., Iyer, R., Smith, M. M. & Haidt, J. Who engages with moral beauty?. J. Moral Educ. 42, 139–163 (2013).
4. Haidt, J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108, 814–834 (2001).
5. Haidt, J. & Keltner, D. Appreciation of beauty and excellence [awe, wonder, elevation]. in Character strengths and virtues, Edited by: Peterson, C and Seligman, MEP. 537–551. Oxford University Press (2004).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献