Abstract
AbstractDivision of labour characterizes all major evolutionary transitions, such as the evolution of eukaryotic cells or multicellular organisms. Social insects are characterized by reproductive division of labour, with one or a few reproducing individuals (queens) and many non-reproducing nestmates (workers) forming a colony. Among the workers, further division of labour can occur with different individuals performing different tasks such as foraging, brood care or building. While mechanisms underlying task division are intensively studied in social Hymenoptera, less is known for termites, which independently evolved eusociality. We investigated molecular mechanisms underlying task division in termite workers to test for communality with social Hymenoptera. We compared similar-aged foraging workers with builders of the fungus-growing termite Macrotermes bellicosus using transcriptomes, endocrine measures and estimators of physiological condition. Based on results for social Hymenoptera and theory, we tested the hypotheses that (i) foragers are in worse physiological conditions than builders, (ii) builders are more similar in their gene expression profile to queens than foragers are, and (iii) builders invest more in anti-ageing mechanism than foragers. Our results support all three hypotheses. We found storage proteins to underlie task division of these similar-aged termite workers and these genes also characterize reproductive division of labour between queens and workers. This implies a co-option of nutrient-based pathways to regulate division of labour across lineages of termites and social Hymenoptera, which are separated by more than 133 million years.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im Breisgau
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Maynard Smith, J. & Szathmáry, E. The Major Transitions in Evolution (Oxford University Press, 1997).
2. Korb, J. & Heinze, J. Major hurdles for the evolution of sociality. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 61, 297–316 (2016).
3. Bourke, A. F. G. The validity and value of inclusive fitness theory. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278, 3313–3320 (2011).
4. Wilson, E. O. The Insect Societies (Harvard University Press, 1971).
5. Jeanne, R. L. The evolution of the organization of work in social insects. Monit. Zool. Ital. Ital. J. Zool. 20, 119–133 (1986).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献