Author:
Jawad Baker Nawfal,Shaker Shakir Maytham,Altintas Izzet,Eugen-Olsen Jesper,Nehlin Jan O.,Andersen Ove,Kallemose Thomas
Abstract
AbstractSeveral scores predicting mortality at the emergency department have been developed. However, all with shortcomings either simple and applicable in a clinical setting, with poor performance, or advanced, with high performance, but clinically difficult to implement. This study aimed to explore if machine learning algorithms could predict all-cause short- and long-term mortality based on the routine blood test collected at admission. Methods: We analyzed data from a retrospective cohort study, including patients > 18 years admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) of Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark between November 2013 and March 2017. The primary outcomes were 3-, 10-, 30-, and 365-day mortality after admission. PyCaret, an automated machine learning library, was used to evaluate the predictive performance of fifteen machine learning algorithms using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Data from 48,841 admissions were analyzed, of these 34,190 (70%) were randomly divided into training data, and 14,651 (30%) were in test data. Eight machine learning algorithms achieved very good to excellent results of AUC on test data in a of range 0.85–0.93. In prediction of short-term mortality, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), leukocyte counts and differentials, Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were the best predictors, whereas prediction of long-term mortality was favored by age, LDH, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), albumin, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Conclusion: The findings suggest that measures of biomarkers taken from one blood sample during admission to the ED can identify patients at high risk of short-and long-term mortality following emergency admissions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Silva, I., Moody, G., Scott, D.J., Celi, L.A., & Mark, R.G. Predicting in-hospital mortality of ICU patients: The PhysioNet/Computing in cardiology challenge 2012. In Computing in Cardiology (2012).
2. Knaus, W.A. APACHE 1978-2001: The development of a quality assurance system based on prognosis: Milestones and personal reflections. Vol. 137, Archives of Surgery. 2002.
3. Silcock, D. J., Corfield, A. R., Gowens, P. A. & Rooney, K. D. Validation of the National Early Warning Score in the prehospital setting. Resuscitation 89(C), 31–35 (2015).
4. Mahmoodpoor, A. et al. Prognostic value of national early warning score and modified early warning score on intensive care unit readmission and mortality: A prospective observational study. Front. Med. 4, 9 (2022).
5. Burch, V. C., Tarr, G. & Morroni, C. Modified early warning score predicts the need for hospital admission and inhospital mortality. Emerg. Med J. 25(10), 674–678 (2008).