Abstract
AbstractThe efficacy of needle-shaped nano-hydroxyapatite (nHA; Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) as a phosphate (Pi) fertilizer was evaluated as well as its impact on soil and soybean (Glycine max) bacterial and fungal communities. Microbial communities were evaluated in soy fertilized with nHA using ITS (internal transcribed spacer) and 16S rRNA high-throughput gene sequencing. Separate greenhouse growth experiments using agriculturally relevant nHA concentrations and application methods were used to assess plant growth and yield compared with no Pi (−P), soluble Pi (+P), and bulk HA controls. Overall, nHA treatments did not show significantly increased growth, biomass, total plant phosphorus concentrations, or yield compared with no Pi controls. Soil and rhizosphere community structures in controls and nHA treatment groups were similar, with minor shifts in the nHA-containing pots comparable to bulk HA controls at equal concentrations. The implementation of nHA in an agriculturally realistic manner and the resulting poor soy growth advises that contrary to some reports under specialized conditions, this nano-fertilizer may not be a viable alternative to traditional Pi fertilizers. If nano-phosphate fertilizers are to achieve their conjectured agricultural potential, alternative nHAs, with differing morphologies, physicochemical properties, and interactions with the soil matrix could be investigated using the evaluative procedures described.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. United Nations. World projected to reach 9.6 billion by 2050. (2013). http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/un-report-world-population-projected-to-reach-9-6-billionby-2050.html. (Accessed: 4th January 2018).
2. Simpson, R. J. et al. Strategies and agronomic interventions to improve the phosphorus-use efficiency of farming systems. Plant Soil 349, 89–120 (2011).
3. Lambers, H. & Plaxton, W. C. Phosphorus: back to the roots. in Annual Plant Reviews Volume 48 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118958841.ch1 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015).
4. Smith, V. H. & Schindler, D. W. Eutrophication science: where do we go from here? Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 201–207 (2009).
5. Scholz, R. W. & Wellmer, F.-W. Approaching a dynamic view on the availability of mineral resources: What we may learn from the case of phosphorus? Glob. Environ. Chang. 23, 11–27 (2013).
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献