The public’s preferred level of involvement in local policy-making

Author:

Haesevoets Tessa,Roets Arne,Van Severen Ruben,Dierckx Kim,Verschuere Bram

Abstract

AbstractWe investigated what people consider the optimal level of citizen involvement in local policy decision-making. This is an important question to answer, given that civil servants and politicians are increasingly confronted with the pressure to add a participatory layer to representative democratic policy-making. Across five empirical studies (total N = 1470), we consistently found that, overall, the most preferred decision-making model is a balanced model in which citizens and the government are equally involved. Despite this preferred ‘overall’ pattern of equal involvement, we identified three subgroups within the citizenry with different preference curves: Some citizens prefer a model in which citizens and the government are truly equal partners, whereas others prefer a model in which either the government or citizens are relatively more involved in the policy decision-making process. The main contribution of our work is thus that we identified a perceived ‘overall’ optimal level of citizen engagement, and variations to that optimum depending on citizens’ individual traits. This information might be helpful to policy-makers in developing effective citizen participation processes.

Funder

Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference55 articles.

1. Dalton, R. J. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Oxford University Press, 2004).

2. Pharr, S. J. & Putnam, R. D. Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? (Princeton University Press, 2000).

3. Flinders, M., Wood, M., & Corbett, J. Anti-politics and democratic innovation. In Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance (eds Elstub, S. & Escobar, O.) 148–160 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019).

4. Landemore, H. Deliberative democracy as open, not (just) representative democracy. Daedalus 146, 51–63 (2017).

5. Zmerli, S. & Van der Meer, T. W. G. Handbook on Political Trust (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cham, 2016).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3