Author:
Leung C. H.,Rizoli S. B.,Trypcic S.,Rhind S. G.,Battista A. P.,Ailenberg M.,Rotstein O. D.
Abstract
AbstractResuscitation induced ischemia/reperfusion predisposes trauma patients to systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction. We investigated the effect of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), a treatment shown to prevent ischemia/reperfusion injury in experimental models of hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation, on the systemic immune-inflammatory profile in trauma patients in a randomized trial. We conducted a prospective, single-centre, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial involving trauma patients sustaining blunt or penetrating trauma in hemorrhagic shock admitted to a Level 1 trauma centre. Patients were randomized to receive RIC (four cycles of 5-min pressure cuff inflation at 250 mmHg and deflation on the thigh) or a Sham intervention. The primary outcomes were neutrophil oxidative burst activity, cellular adhesion molecule expression, and plasma levels of myeloperoxidase, cytokines and chemokines in peripheral blood samples, drawn at admission (pre-intervention), 1 h, 3 h, and 24 h post-admission. Secondary outcomes included ventilator, ICU and hospital free days, incidence of nosocomial infections, 24 h and 28 day mortality. 50 eligible patients were randomized; of which 21 in the Sham group and 18 in the RIC group were included in the full analysis. No treatment effect was observed between Sham and RIC groups for neutrophil oxidative burst activity, adhesion molecule expression, and plasma levels of myeloperoxidase and cytokines. RIC prevented significant increases in Th2 chemokines TARC/CCL17 (P < 0.01) and MDC/CCL22 (P < 0.05) at 24 h post-intervention in comparison to the Sham group. Secondary clinical outcomes were not different between groups. No adverse events in relation to the RIC intervention were observed. Administration of RIC was safe and did not adversely affect clinical outcomes. While trauma itself modified several immunoregulatory markers, RIC failed to alter expression of the majority of markers. However, RIC may influence Th2 chemokine expression in the post resuscitation period. Further investigation into the immunomodulatory effects of RIC in traumatic injuries and their impact on clinical outcomes is warranted.ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02071290.
Funder
Rae Fellowship, St. Michael’s Hospital Foundation and Mitacs
Physicians Services Incorporated Foundation, Defence Research and Development Canada, Department of National Defence
Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research
This work was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. GBD-CoD-Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390(10100), 1151–1210 (2017).
2. Lord, J. M. et al. The systemic immune response to trauma: An overview of pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet 384(9952), 1455–1465 (2014).
3. de Jager, P., Smith, O., Pool, R., Bolon, S. & Richards, G. A. Review of the pathophysiology and prognostic biomarkers of immune dysregulation after severe injury. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 90(2), e21–e30 (2021).
4. Tsukamoto, T., Chanthaphavong, R. S. & Pape, H. C. Current theories on the pathophysiology of multiple organ failure after trauma. Injury 41(1), 21–26 (2010).
5. Partrick, D. A., Moore, F. A., Moore, E. E., Barnett, C. C. Jr. & Silliman, C. C. Neutrophil priming and activation in the pathogenesis of postinjury multiple organ failure. New Horiz. 4(2), 194–210 (1996).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献