Author:
Nishimura Etsuko,Shoki Rina,Kato Mika,Yoneoka Daisuke,Okawa Sumiyo,Tabuchi Takahiro,Ota Erika
Abstract
AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has forced lifestyles changes and affected the relationships between fathers and their infants. However, the factors associated with paternal–infant bonding have not been clarified. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with father–infant bonding during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. This cross-sectional study used data from a nationwide survey and the Japanese version of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS) to measure father–infant bonding. The participants were divided into two groups depending on their partners’ parity. A linear regression model (Gauss–Markov-type) was used for both groups. A total of 1055 men were included in the analysis. Of these men, 521 (49.4%) had a primipara partner, and 534 (50.6%) had a multipara partner. No significant differences were found between the two groups’ MIBS-J scores. Fathers’ mental health, relationship with the partner and family members, abusive behavior towards children, wanted pregnancy, and the youngest child’s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission history were associated with father–infant bonding. Regarding factors related to COVID-19, caring for the child while the partner is at home has a negative impact on bonding, while fear related to infection with COVID-19 has no negative impact on bonding.
Funder
the Tokyo Foundation Institute for Policy Studies' research program "Using Health Metrics to Monitor and Evaluate the Impact of Health Policies"
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. de Cock, E. S. et al. Continuous feelings of love? The parental bond from pregnancy to toddlerhood. J. Fam. Psychol. 30, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000138 (2016).
2. Spinner, M. R. Maternal-infant bonding. Can. Fam. Physician 24, 1151–1153 (1978).
3. Winston, R. & Chicot, R. The importance of early bonding on the long-term mental health and resilience of children. Lond. J. Prim. Care (Abingdon) 8, 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2015.1133012 (2016).
4. Henderson, J. On fathering (the nature and functions of the father role) Part II: Conceptualization of fathering. Can. J. Psychiatry 25, 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674378002500511 (1980).
5. Tudiver, F. Fathers and childbearing: New dimensions. Can. Fam. Physician 27, 984–988 (1981).