Author:
Miró Catalina Queralt,Vidal-Alaball Josep,Fuster-Casanovas Aïna,Escalé-Besa Anna,Ruiz Comellas Anna,Solé-Casals Jordi
Abstract
AbstractInterpreting chest X-rays is a complex task, and artificial intelligence algorithms for this purpose are currently being developed. It is important to perform external validations of these algorithms in order to implement them. This study therefore aims to externally validate an AI algorithm’s diagnoses in real clinical practice, comparing them to a radiologist’s diagnoses. The aim is also to identify diagnoses the algorithm may not have been trained for. A prospective observational study for the external validation of the AI algorithm in a region of Catalonia, comparing the AI algorithm’s diagnosis with that of the reference radiologist, considered the gold standard. The external validation was performed with a sample of 278 images and reports, 51.8% of which showed no radiological abnormalities according to the radiologist's report. Analysing the validity of the AI algorithm, the average accuracy was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92; 0.98), the sensitivity was 0.48 (95% CI 0.30; 0.66) and the specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97; 0.99). The conditions where the algorithm was most sensitive were external, upper abdominal and cardiac and/or valvular implants. On the other hand, the conditions where the algorithm was less sensitive were in the mediastinum, vessels and bone. The algorithm has been validated in the primary care setting and has proven to be useful when identifying images with or without conditions. However, in order to be a valuable tool to help and support experts, it requires additional real-world training to enhance its diagnostic capabilities for some of the conditions analysed. Our study emphasizes the need for continuous improvement to ensure the algorithm’s effectiveness in primary care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Novelline, R. A. & Squire, L. F. Squire’s fundamentals of radiology. La Editorial U, editor. (2004).
2. W H. Learning radiology: Recognizing the basics. Sciences EH, editor. (2015).
3. Hwang, E. J. et al. Development and validation of a deep learning-based automated detection algorithm for major thoracic diseases on chest radiographs. JAMA Netw. Open 2(3), e191095. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1095 (2019).
4. Wu, J. T. et al. Comparison of chest radiograph interpretations by artificial intelligence algorithm vs radiology residents. JAMA Netw. Open 3(10), e2022779. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22779 (2020).
5. Santos, Á. & Solís, P. Posición SERAM sobre la necesidad de informar la radiología simple. Soc Española Radiol Médica 1, 1–47 (2015).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献