Assessment of image quality and impact of deep learning-based software in non-contrast head CT scans

Author:

Bos DeniseORCID,Demircioğlu Aydin,Neuhoff Julia,Haubold Johannes,Zensen Sebastian,Opitz Marcel K.,Drews Marcel A.,Li Yan,Styczen Hanna,Forsting Michael,Nassenstein Kai

Abstract

AbstractIn this retrospective study, we aimed to assess the objective and subjective image quality of different reconstruction techniques and a deep learning-based software on non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) images. In total, 152 adult head CT scans (77 female, 75 male; mean age 69.4 ± 18.3 years) obtained from three different CT scanners using different protocols between March and April 2021 were included. CT images were reconstructed using filtered-back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (IR), and post-processed using a deep learning-based algorithm (PS). Post-processing significantly reduced noise in FBP-reconstructed images (up to 15.4% reduction) depending on the protocol, leading to improvements in signal-to-noise ratio of up to 19.7%. However, when deep learning-based post-processing was applied to FBP images compared to IR alone, the differences were inconsistent and partly non-significant, which appeared to be protocol or site specific. Subjective assessments showed no significant overall improvement in image quality for all reconstructions and post-processing. Inter-rater reliability was low and preferences varied. Deep learning-based denoising software improved objective image quality compared to FBP in routine head CT. A significant difference compared to IR was observed for only one protocol. Subjective assessments did not indicate a significant clinical impact in terms of improved subjective image quality, likely due to the low noise levels in full-dose images.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Universitätsklinikum Essen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference32 articles.

1. Smits, M. et al. Minor head injury: Guidelines for the use of CT—a multicenter validation study. Radiology 245, 831–838. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2452061509 (2007).

2. American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria. (2012) https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria, Accessed 09-13-2023.

3. Powers, W. J. et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke 50, e344–e418. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 (2019).

4. International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2012). Radiation—IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

5. National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 (The National Academies Press, Washington, 2006).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3