Author:
Davoudabadi Mohammad Javad,Pagendam Daniel,Drovandi Christopher,Baldock Jeff,White Gentry
Abstract
AbstractSoil carbon accounting and prediction play a key role in building decision support systems for land managers selling carbon credits, in the spirit of the Paris and Kyoto protocol agreements. Land managers typically rely on computationally complex models fit using sparse datasets to make these accounts and predictions. The model complexity and sparsity of the data can lead to over-fitting, leading to inaccurate results when making predictions with new data. Modellers address over-fitting by simplifying their models and reducing the number of parameters, and in the current context this could involve neglecting some soil organic carbon (SOC) components. In this study, we introduce two novel SOC models and a new RothC-like model and investigate how the SOC components and complexity of the SOC models affect the SOC prediction in the presence of small and sparse time series data. We develop model selection methods that can identify the soil carbon model with the best predictive performance, in light of the available data. Through this analysis we reveal that commonly used complex soil carbon models can over-fit in the presence of sparse time series data, and our simpler models can produce more accurate predictions.
Funder
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Australian Research Council Discovery Project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Adams, M. et al. Managing the soil-plant system to mitigate atmospheric CO2. Tech. Rep., Discussion paper for the Soil Carbon Sequestration Summit, 31 January-2 February 2011. The United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney. (2011).
2. Shi, Z. et al. The age distribution of global soil carbon inferred from radiocarbon measurements. Nat. Geosci. 13, 555–559 (2020).
3. Jenkinson, D. S., Hart, P. B. S., Rayner, J. H. & Parry, L. C. Modelling the turnover of organic matter in long-term experiments at Rothamsted. INTECOL Bull. 15, 1–8 (1987).
4. Jenkinson, D. S. The turnover of organic carbon and nitrogen in soil. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 329, 361–368 (1990).
5. Parton, W. J., Stewart, J. W. & Cole, C. V. Dynamics of C, N, P and S in grassland soils: A model. Biogeochemistry 5, 109–131 (1988).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献