Embedding responsibility in intelligent systems: from AI ethics to responsible AI ecosystems

Author:

Stahl Bernd CarstenORCID

Abstract

AbstractIntelligent systems that are capable of making autonomous decisions based on input from their environment have great potential to do good, but they also raise significant social and ethical concerns. The discourse on ethics and artificial intelligence (AI) has covered these concerns in depth and developed an array of possible ways of addressing them. This article argues that a shortcoming of this discourse is that it concentrates on specific issues and their mitigation but neglects the nature of intelligent systems as socio-technical systems of systems that are often described as ecosystems. Building on the discussion of ethics and AI, the article suggests that it would be beneficial to come to an understanding of what would constitute responsible AI ecosystems. By introducing the concept of meta-responsibility or higher-level responsibility, the article proposes characteristics that an ecosystem would have to fulfil, in order to be considered a responsible ecosystem. This perspective is theoretically interesting because it extends the current AI ethics discourse. It furthermore offers a novel perspective for researchers and developers of intelligent system and helps them reflect on the way they relate to ethical issues.

Funder

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference79 articles.

1. Fischer, J. M. Recent work on moral responsibility. Ethics 110, 93–139 (1999).

2. Hall, W. & Pesenti, J. Growing the artificial intelligence industry in the UK. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/652097/Growing_the_artificial_intelligence_industry_in_the_UK.pdf (2017).

3. Wiener, N. Some moral and technical consequences of automation. Science 131, 1355–1358 (1960).

4. Weizenbaum, J. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation (W.H. Freeman & Co Ltd, 1977).

5. Dreyfus, H. L. What Computers Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason (Harper & Row, 1972).

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Infrastructural justice for responsible software engineering,;Journal of Responsible Technology;2024-09

2. Algorithmic bias: Social science research integration through the 3-D Dependable AI Framework;Current Opinion in Psychology;2024-08

3. Responsabilidade Moral Distribuída: Contribuições para o Debate sobre Inteligência Artificial Ética e Responsável;Anais do V Workshop sobre as Implicações da Computação na Sociedade (WICS 2024);2024-07-21

4. Large language models: Expectations for semantics-driven systems engineering;Data & Knowledge Engineering;2024-07

5. Semantic interlinking of Immigration Data using LLMs for Knowledge Graph Construction;Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024;2024-05-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3