Abstract
AbstractPeripheral intravenous catheter failure is a significant concern in the clinical setting. We investigated the effectiveness of care protocols, including an ultrasonographic “pre-scan” for selecting a large-diameter vein before catheterization, a “post-scan” for confirming the catheter tip position after catheterization with ultrasonography, and the use of a flexible polyurethane catheter to reduce the mechanical irritation that contributes to the incidence of catheter failure. This intervention study was a non-randomized controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of the abovementioned care protocols, the effects of which were compared to the outcomes in the control group, which received conventional care. For both groups, participants were selected from patients in two wards at the University of Tokyo in Japan between July and November 2017. Inverse probability score-based weighted methods (IPW) using propensity score were used to estimate the effectiveness of care protocols. The primary outcome was catheter failure, which was defined as accidental and unplanned catheter removal. We used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to compare rates of time until catheter failure. We analysed 189 and 233 catheters in the intervention and control groups, respectively. In the control group, 68 catheters (29.2%) were determined to have failed, whereas, in the intervention group, only 21 catheters (11.1%) failed. There was a significant difference between each group regarding the ratio of catheter failure adjusted according to IPW (p = 0.003). The relative risk reduction of the intervention for catheter failure was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.47–0.71). Care protocols, including assessment of vein diameter, vein depth, and catheter tip location using ultrasound examination for reducing mechanical irritation is a promising method to reduce catheter failure incidence.
Funder
Yamaji Fumiko Nursing Research Found, H28
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference69 articles.
1. Waitt., C., Waitt., P. & Pirmohamed, M. Intravenous therapy. Postgrad. Med. J. 80, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2003.010421 (2003).
2. Ritchie, S., Jowitt, D. & Roberts, S. & Auckland District Health Board Infection Control, S. The Auckland City Hospital Device Point Prevalence Survey 2005: utilisation and infectious complications of intravascular and urinary devices. N. Z. Med. J. 120, U2683 (2007).
3. Pujol, M. et al. Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections at a university-affiliated hospital. J. Hosp. Infect. 67, 22–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2007.06.017 (2007).
4. Koh, D. B., Gowardman, J. R., Rickard, C. M., Robertson, I. K. & Brown, A. Prospective study of peripheral arterial catheter infection and comparison with concurrently sited central venous catheters. Crit. Care Med. 36, 397–402, https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318161f74b (2008).
5. Rickard, C. M. et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet 380, 1066–1074, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61082-4 (2012).
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献