Author:
Zhu Baohua,Jiang Jie,Yu Hui,Huang Lan,Zhou Dandan
Abstract
AbstractOur study focused on evaluating the effect of three common vasoactive drugs on the prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis and pre-existing heart failure. The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database, Version 1.4, was used. Our study included critically ill older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with sepsis and heart failure treated with vasoactive drugs. Patients were divided into norepinephrine group, norepinephrine combined with vasopressin group, and dopamine group. The baseline characteristics, primary outcome, and secondary outcome measures were compared among the three groups. In total, 1357 elderly patients were included (766 in norepinephrine group, 250 in norepinephrine combined with vasopressin group, and 341 in dopamine group). After propensity score matching, statistically significant differences in 28-d and 90-d mortality (P = 0.046, P = 0.031) were observed; meanwhile, there was a significant difference in the incidence of mechanical ventilation, AKI, and malignant arrhythmias. Cox regression analysis revealed that norepinephrine combined with vasopressin decreased 5-year survival statistically(P = 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated dopamine as an independent risk factor in reducing ICU and hospital length of stay (P = 0.001, P = 0.017). Logistic regression analysis showed dopamine was an independent risk factor for new-onset arrhythmias (P < 0.001), while norepinephrine combined with vasopressin was an independent risk factor for new-onset malignant arrhythmias (P < 0.001). Norepinephrine in combination with vasopressin decreased survival and increased the incidence of malignant arrhythmias in elderly sepsis patients with pre-existing heart failure. Dopamine alone reduces ICU and hospital length of stay but increases the new-onset arrhythmias.
Funder
Nanjing Medical Science and Technology Development Program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Editorial: Global Population Aging - Health Care, Social and Economic Consequences - PubMed. Accessed 29 Jun 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30515374/
2. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3.
3. Rudd, K. E. et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 395(10219), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7 (2020).
4. Xie, J. et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in Chinese ICUs: A national cross-sectional survey. Crit. Care Med. 2020, E209–E218. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004155 (2020).
5. Singer, M., Inada-Kim, M. & Shankar-Hari, M. Sepsis hysteria: Excess hype and unrealistic expectations. Lancet 394(10208), 1513–1514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32483-3 (2019).