Author:
Brothers Kimberly M.,Parker Dana M.,Taguchi Masashi,Ma Dongzhu,Mandell Jonathan B.,Thurlow Lance L.,Byrapogu Venkata C.,Urish Kenneth L.
Abstract
AbstractAntibiotic stewardship is viewed as having great public health benefit with limited direct benefit to the patient at the time of administration. The objective of our study was to determine if inappropriate administration of antibiotics could create conditions that would increase the rates of surgical infection. We hypothesized that sub-MIC levels of vancomycin would increase Staphylococcus aureus growth, biofilm formation, and rates of infection. S. aureus MRSA and MSSA strains were used for all experiments. Bacteria were grown planktonically and monitored using spectrophotometry. Quantitative agar culture was used to measure planktonic and biofilm bacterial burden. A mouse abscess model was used to confirm phenotypes in vivo. In the planktonic growth assay, increases in bacterial burden at ¼ MIC vancomycin were observed in USA300 JE2 by 72 h. Similar findings were observed with ½ MIC in Newman and SH1000. For biofilm formation, USA300 JE2 at ¼ and ½ MIC vancomycin increased biofilm formation by approximately 1.3- and 2.3-fold respectively at 72 h as compared to untreated controls. Similar findings were observed with Newman and SH1000 with a 2.4-fold increase in biofilm formation at ½ MIC vancomycin. In a mouse abscess model, there was a 1.2-fold increase with sub-MIC vancomycin at 3 days post infection. Our study showed that Sub-optimal vancomycin dosing promoted S. aureus planktonic growth and biofilm formation, phenotypic measures of bacterial virulence. This phenotype induced by sub-MIC levels of vancomycin was also observed to increase rates of infection and pathogenesis in our mouse model. Risks of exposure to sub-MIC concentrations with vancomycin in surgical procedures are greater as there is decreased bioavailability in tissue in comparison to other antibiotics. This highlights the importance of proper antibiotic selection, stewardship, and dosing for both surgical prophylaxis and treatment of infection.
Funder
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Sandegren, L. Selection of antibiotic resistance at very low antibiotic concentrations. Ups J. Med. Sci. 119, 103–107. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2014.904457 (2014).
2. Ryan, S. P. et al. Is there a difference in infection risk between single and multiple doses of prophylactic antibiotics? A meta-analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 477, 1577–1590. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000619 (2019).
3. Tan, T. L. et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty: A single dose is as effective as multiple doses. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 101, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00336 (2019).
4. Urish, K. L. et al. A multicenter study of irrigation and debridement in total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection: Treatment failure is high. J. Arthroplasty 33, 1154–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.029 (2018).
5. Shah, M. Q. et al. Surgical site infection in orthopaedic implants and its common bacteria with their sensitivities to antibiotics, in open reduction internal fixation. J. Ayub Med. Coll. Abbottabad 29, 50–53 (2017).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献